[netconf] Adoption-suitable vs adoption (Re: Adoption-suitability for draft-wang-netconf-bulk-subscribed-notifications)

Alexander L Clemm <ludwig@clemm.org> Tue, 11 August 2020 06:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ludwig@clemm.org>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF283A0CB3 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 23:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TOjWCAiHnh6c for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 23:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 401D93A0C9B for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 23:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] ([]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus002 []) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MRnRf-1kGgE03ajB-00Sv2m; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 08:22:30 +0200
To: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
References: <01000173c0b45676-dc00a30e-1234-45d2-ba20-131c9467110d-000000@us-east-1.amazonses.com>
From: Alexander L Clemm <ludwig@clemm.org>
Message-ID: <a7683e8c-2959-d7dc-efe5-4dc627523d42@clemm.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 23:22:27 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <01000173c0b45676-dc00a30e-1234-45d2-ba20-131c9467110d-000000@us-east-1.amazonses.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------A18023ECD6EAEF1970294689"
Content-Language: en-US
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:EGqxibV6bSUhGwCNfD1if5J2Af7imYGvzX7EBUqUgSuT67BSp8K XgPvPscUlkzRFF/0i5o/cZIBpMZxu3Kpsx4eRLNHMBbacqG82bL9geTjPxGGVmOM4mHXdMZ t04JEY3CJfBUan1GCv4IFlaf5kOCl27Py4Ip7Tnb+DNMaFD3kjHFCYLVK0qfeaeayxr3s4E SswITHbtUhjBGaU80x1ig==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:EFGIheZydv8=:Weg6Z1jFXTo89APqbieGAw epwWgoCbjgD0QvTYyGjVtiZ0VtLqcj12hV/ose2Td7V2+ZLop1YQiLVQYE2LP8OSgb6ThPCC7 +lK+eA7sjSIfxriR7Eslu2wjnkU8OqMnjkXnsB66QHp2Xj4phhUcJtUNMoTONCPhTCCLNp6fH yXZXsc3qwzVp57nSe7lqsxkPE92iwf/9HfTgEvbapnvKQEHELsS4tuH+iSXEqMVCwpCN3LAoJ lQpoUCIv75QIMFESrz5KozSSkz96rYPyXpR7KZcuNE6dA7NnpcObiZ+LpmYifVTnWdji3nabO SSAH28tsCy86iZlEhLG/e1PYJZCLp/XSdlD6EkRyZ4ub8h91bQXKNWV+rVFqR31y1bjickeU9 YtYMzqNJQr/yMa8RNAOcemEyDnVzh5hPtLFo1fV44K0yP1nHEQdqi6q7sCq8+GPzh24SCb2hz Q+IIWd6p8mq+2IhJgGTVq+Mhl5Yuf+QDvPBfxgaz6ifRfGzoH4nci34GyICbFHy1xosrH/6mD xCF6I8dE+Lve2OcUvGEppDKTjLnfNNtYIBYBDhETN25PpvnzJupKF1lx4wxH1ywbwPYjMQSGr TpKZo/AsdvWJ+z+9yI5Gw7c2jLMxXomU0oonSnhY+RiwKJwYxHfLf2w48fEusj5zFB0D8dw9U KdTfASO6jBlNLm2rSIITolSJWisD+qJTSxL3YJvGaicA4EbcatcwM5NweaKw7RqUff9nrhOdf 3DdtE8fTDV06sBB1YiwLGvdSzqhcj8i1iE3IithPa78utWrSqDXZnnp8jzjLTh3fu6Awy1w85 dlrVOR9TMlMf4GDqQ1YBDgmC+4/ckDMVes2mSl3xrkS3+LetBd86MoxDM16CYcOMuqv5X5a
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/LLs-yhQym1xL-ZLL2CNNRelHIx4>
Subject: [netconf] Adoption-suitable vs adoption (Re: Adoption-suitability for draft-wang-netconf-bulk-subscribed-notifications)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 06:22:34 -0000


I am not quite sure about the purpose of these adoption-suitability
polls (not just for this but for the various other drafts) and was
wondering about the rationale for it.  It seems to me to be redundant
with anactual adoption call - do we foresee situations where a draft is
adoption-suitable but would not actually be adopted?  If a draft is
deemed to not yet be adoption-suitable, is there any difference to the
draft not yet being adopted?  What is expected to happen in the interim
state or time period between when a draft is deemed "adoption-suitable"
until it actually gets adopted? 


--- Alex

On 8/5/2020 3:18 PM, Kent Watsen wrote:
> Per the previous email sent moments ago, the chairs would like to
> solicit input on the following draft:
>    Title: Bulk Subscription to YANG Event Notification
>    Link:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wang-netconf-bulk-subscribed-notifications
>    Abstract:
>       This document defines a YANG data model and associated mechanism
> that
>       allows subscriber applications to bulk subscribe to publishers'
> event
>       streams based on bundle group information such as bundle size and
>       bundle latency.  This allows the publishers to report multiple
>       notifications in a single bundling message.
> In particular, please discuss adoption-suitability as it regards to
> the following questions:
>     1) is the problem important for the NETCONF WG to solve?
>     2) is the draft a suitable basis for the work?
> PS: this message is itself not an adoption poll, but rather an attempt
> to gauge interest/support for a potential future adoption poll.
> NETCONF Chairs
> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list
> netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf