[netconf] SN and indirection

Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Fri, 30 August 2019 10:38 UTC

Return-Path: <0100016ce21ab15a-16b3c8d4-0722-4ea7-a6c0-081689ae42f4-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F15120C55 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 03:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zECKLLnt52km for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 03:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a8-96.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a8-96.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.8.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51C48120918 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 03:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=6gbrjpgwjskckoa6a5zn6fwqkn67xbtw; d=amazonses.com; t=1567161496; h=From:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Date:Subject:Message-Id:Cc:To:Feedback-ID; bh=Pht6mV+IFLM49328ozSjV2mxGiO0L3evupulw0ieSgM=; b=AAhdMJdzX8wvHzazvtMq71OF+nWYXoRgTBRegpImcN4hnS5zfYi5HXYZeh7BRoKh oB19jSomYo/qX1fFu5Im1ID5cyp3v6vV+NEYUNKL8etG5iWXT77ybsA+j+KdysH9hq7 aLD2Sw9cYAo7JLtiO5C7lfmp4TZhRSOmI25L8mvo=
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:38:15 +0000
Message-ID: <0100016ce21ab15a-16b3c8d4-0722-4ea7-a6c0-081689ae42f4-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Cc: netconf@ietf.org
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16G77)
X-SES-Outgoing: 2019.08.30-54.240.8.96
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/LYbekmWYPUHdmo3IFtuosptkBsY>
Subject: [netconf] SN and indirection
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:38:19 -0000

In the https-notif adoption call, Martin writes:

> (*) An observation: This module introduces a level of indirection for
> receivers; something we should have done in the
> subscribed-notifications model directly.  Perhaps we should revisit
> that model and add the indirection there instead.

What is meant by “revisit”?   SN is in Auth48.  Pull it back or start a bis now?

FWIW, it seems that SN also lacks a structure conducive to supporting multi-stream originators.  

Kent // any hat