[Netconf] AD review of draft-ietf-netconf-call-home-09
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Fri, 18 September 2015 12:48 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD441B2B87; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 05:48:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.81
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.81 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J97R7S0NPqTE; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 05:48:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D70291B2B7C; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 05:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2604; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1442580511; x=1443790111; h=from:subject:to:message-id:date:mime-version; bh=GHomGmCfGwK/McI+38OgcxYFh0ZAZEw9l3FpqPOlHPk=; b=FWaLSTZSePg6pWXX/7rKIJLZfJ5tuCIBQBGIc7rQis+tnvDylIoLNDhF 5FkDA+bMD8STY2bFzcqXOC/wVEtCe7HBXt7bH8Ew6QDHgwdKnaGbv4M8a HQQd5DK5lySHQHCzPpLYgHGPsfZlNZSh12fD6a0/CYw3O5mP+bfvXb1lt U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CkBADfBvxV/xbLJq1dg3e+PoF5hXmBbhIBAQEBAQEBgQqETVUgARwWCwILAwIBAgFLAQwIAQGIKg23DpQ1AQEBAQYBAQEBAQEYBIZziT9HgnSBQwWVYoURgm6FCIFNhDWCfolgiDkoAjmEAzyKIAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,552,1437436800"; d="scan'208,217";a="611690369"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Sep 2015 12:48:27 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.87] (ams-bclaise-8916.cisco.com [10.60.67.87]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t8ICmRLQ013143; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 12:48:27 GMT
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: NETCONF <netconf@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-netconf-call-home@ietf.org
Message-ID: <55FC081B.6010302@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 14:48:27 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060202090209010302080506"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/NPXN4BUi4nvY--SScySu3LweViw>
Subject: [Netconf] AD review of draft-ietf-netconf-call-home-09
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 12:48:37 -0000
Dear all,
Thanks for this document.
Two pieces of feedback.
1.
éThis document contains references to other drafts in progress, both
in the Normative References section, as well as in body text
throughout. Please update the following references to reflect their
final RFC assignments:
odraft-ietf-netconf-restconf
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-restconf>
odraft-ietf-netconf-server-modelé
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-server-model>
Actually, [draft-ietf-netconf-server-model
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-server-model>] is in the
informative reference, so it doesn't apply.
2. In order to ease the reading wrt client/server, you might consider
this terminology
"NETCONF/RESTCONF client" can refers to the RFC 6241 section 1.1
"client"
"NETCONF/RESTCONF server" can refers to the RFC 6241 section 1.1
"server"
Regards, Benoit
- [Netconf] AD review of draft-ietf-netconf-call-ho… Benoit Claise