Re: [Netconf] Anyone want just Configured Subscriptions?

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Sun, 08 July 2018 16:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D999130EC1 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Jul 2018 09:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q-g60fHJ3VjN for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Jul 2018 09:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D2A8130E4F for <netconf@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Jul 2018 09:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (h-155-4-133-90.NA.cust.bahnhof.se [155.4.133.90]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 997291AE02BD; Sun, 8 Jul 2018 18:05:50 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2018 18:05:52 +0200
Message-Id: <20180708.180552.1582913595227099806.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de
Cc: andy@yumaworks.com, evoit=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org, netconf@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180708100310.gn3xaol66f7c7lo5@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
References: <CABCOCHSfzpj3Kca2RRtNFV6wLLt_6r4p3vfS_j4Hzfai-0Y2gA@mail.gmail.com> <20180708.095807.918450792556408986.mbj@tail-f.com> <20180708100310.gn3xaol66f7c7lo5@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/OceSu4CoTZKas9o9pkAU6if7jqg>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Anyone want just Configured Subscriptions?
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2018 16:05:58 -0000

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2018 at 09:58:07AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > You mean <start-all-configured-subscriptions> I think.
> > 
> > Yes.
> >
> 
> If you do this, why does the client, after receiving a call home, not
> simply create dynamic subscriptions? ;-)

Well, the configured subscription is needed anyway in order for the
device to call home, so having the client create all configured
subscriptions as dynamic subscriptions as well doesn't seem quite
right.

But if the WG agrees that it is ok to send <notification> directly,
this issue goes away.


/martin