[netconf] [Errata Rejected] RFC6241 (5443)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 18 October 2019 20:35 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D24120959; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 13:35:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DMILnuI55mPA; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 13:35:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98B93120804; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 13:35:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id F110CB808FF; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 13:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
To: jnatale@juniper.net, rob.enns@gmail.com, mbj@tail-f.com, j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de, andy@yumaworks.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ibagdona@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, netconf@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20191018203549.F110CB808FF@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 13:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/OfcqWBv19uNxvMig8msIdGuQ_F4>
Subject: [netconf] [Errata Rejected] RFC6241 (5443)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 20:35:56 -0000

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6241,
"Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5443

--------------------------------------
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Jonathan Natale <jnatale@juniper.net>;
Date Reported: 2018-07-27
Rejected by: Ignas Bagdonas (IESG)

Section: 4.4

Original Text
-------------
The <ok> element is sent in <rpc-reply> messages if no errors or
warnings occurred during the processing of an <rpc> request, and no
data was returned from the operation.

Corrected Text
--------------
The <ok> element is sent in <rpc-reply> messages if
and only if
no errors or
warnings occurred during the processing of an <rpc> request, and no
data was returned from the operation.

Notes
-----
I have been informed that an <ok> element should not include any errors or warnings, even in the event of the associated operation completing because the error's severity was only at warning level).
 --VERIFIER NOTES-- 
   Rejected based on WG mailing list discussion: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/nQYVm8sm5pZamtRAIhbcB9cOuos



--------------------------------------
RFC6241 (draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis-10)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)
Publication Date    : June 2011
Author(s)           : R. Enns, Ed., M. Bjorklund, Ed., J. Schoenwaelder, Ed., A. Bierman, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Network Configuration
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG