IETF Logo Mail Archive

[netconf] RFC6241/RFC7952 model-level interop?

Robert Varga <nite@hq.sk> Thu, 28 February 2019 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <nite@hq.sk>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32274130F03 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 08:04:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hq.sk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EDmOUy7WJ-Sj for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 08:04:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hq.sk (hq.sk [81.89.59.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D373130ED6 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 08:04:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nitebug.nitenet.local (chello085216197060.chello.sk [85.216.197.60]) by mail.hq.sk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82C442428B9 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 17:04:35 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hq.sk; s=mail; t=1551369875; bh=Aj0YRQv3lsyW3no9N7fkheL+H7JOxHtOzH7sjBDhOdc=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=pi23r0Km7Uku7Vd31IgGZ1Tmx3kqpbDzZa8glHq+xKKB/eYYAAE3YqxDb+SrS/5VR 3BdTyTYPiAQd/YQjrLDhseqG19tQTu2ShgilaKMkBwQiH7IWLb3/kLNZ34pLpCS+E/ QSto6vPCB+0mG89BJgsmi5DmtkK9sXJMahmbgOXY=
To: netconf@ietf.org
From: Robert Varga <nite@hq.sk>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <dc890e1b-e456-96f6-3ac2-be3c9395df18@hq.sk>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 17:04:29 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cZEbCZH5n8eU8zguProbO724PCFRqoqJN"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/Pn7pKsbLI_N2uhcHk4CPnt04P5g>
Subject: [netconf] RFC6241/RFC7952 model-level interop?
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 16:04:41 -0000

Hello,

as an implementer of both RFC6241 and RFC7952, I would find it very
useful if there were an ietf-netconf.yang which includes the annotation
definition of edit-config's operation attribute (Section 7.2).

Are there any plans for RFC6241bis or similar, bringing only an update
to ietf-netconf.yang?

Thanks,
Robert

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email