From 0100018dfd0db753-6c9cf25b-7eaf-4c5a-9665-7d173163a91f-000000@amazonses.watsen.net Fri Mar 1 18:45:56 2024 Return-Path: <0100018dfd0db753-6c9cf25b-7eaf-4c5a-9665-7d173163a91f-000000@amazonses.watsen.net> X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F71C14F69F; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 18:45:56 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.905 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AvNOIdqTj2bK; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 18:45:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from a48-110.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a48-110.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.48.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22E74C14F696; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 18:45:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=224i4yxa5dv7c2xz3womw6peuasteono; d=amazonses.com; t=1709347551; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:Feedback-ID; bh=FYQs5sw1ZxFe2D0h+Oly/Q/jWe97bZXb9QZ1tLpjM/8=; b=Fd+lhAkMg4NtEM2iArnyFglDXp1Qk7OaJZgvBOA+KOaUILEZDFskSSULte4w1DiH k9HpZVpJhbUVviMKqT0knJW98uvQryqMITX7EJKOoSw11DbwrUeqF/sNx50N/CRIL8k kn9oM4YYzB9ORTa6FIoPYAyY4dNFabXGP45sg2n4= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.400.31\)) From: Kent Watsen In-Reply-To: <170921721988.22173.15145421588758477356@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2024 02:45:51 +0000 Cc: The IESG , draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-client-server@ietf.org, "netconf-chairs@ietf.org" , "netconf@ietf.org" , "Per Andersson (perander)" , Mahesh Jethanandani Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <0100018dfd0db753-6c9cf25b-7eaf-4c5a-9665-7d173163a91f-000000@email.amazonses.com> References: <170921721988.22173.15145421588758477356@ietfa.amsl.com> To: Murray Kucherawy , Amanda Baber via RT X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.400.31) Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES X-SES-Outgoing: 2024.03.02-54.240.48.110 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [netconf] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-client-server-38: (with DISCUSS) X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: NETCONF WG list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2024 02:45:56 -0000 [CC-ing Amanda @ IANA] Hi Murray, Thank you for your valuable comments. Please my responses below. Kent // author > On Feb 29, 2024, at 9:33=E2=80=AFAM, Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker = wrote: >=20 > Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-client-server-38: Discuss >=20 > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut = this > introductory paragraph, however.) >=20 >=20 > Please refer to = https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-position= s/=20 > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT = positions. >=20 >=20 > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-client-server/ >=20 >=20 >=20 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > DISCUSS: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >=20 > BCP 81 says the registration contact has to be the IESG for things = developed by > the IETF. Why do some of them list IANA as the contact? I would argue that BCP 81 should be updated to be more sensitive the = IANA-maintained modules, as it is my feeling that they are rightly = =E2=80=9Ccontact IANA=E2=80=9D. However, not to rock that boat, I have switched the contact to "The = IESG=E2=80=9D in my local copy. I made the change for both this draft and also the tis-client-server = draft. Thanks again! Kent