IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] subscribed-notifications-12

"Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com> Thu, 07 June 2018 13:55 UTC

Return-Path: <evoit@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DBB2131128 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 06:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id inIrRopK70eT for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 06:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90D4113112A for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 06:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1482; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1528379738; x=1529589338; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=bzptKqBnS9WGweLAwzWgCNYW98ogsC73uaRsuQE6iJo=; b=Lowo+j2cqGFKNFji6u8q736kR/oEBHEU8Fs90NGbb3floTQ38f68no5P RdtI0eDyVR/K2bU2VBMYSxnIgJa9+2BixXmzTFIH1oVfTwu3vlNjq4KR5 Cf1RO3YELePpl6UjYN595dQ5J/FCXDLJaax5KngeZe97vAZnm89cLpEpW Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CgAQCVOBlb/40NJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNDYn8oCphZgXmUUoF4CxgLhANGAoJAITUXAQIBAQEBAQECbBwMhSgBAQEEAQE4NAkCDAQCAQgOBwIBHhAnCx0IAgQOBQiDHIF/D6tkiEyBYwWIQoFUP4QbgxEBAYc1Aph7CQKFa4h0jS6KBIcAAhETAYEkHgE2gVJwFTuCQ4V8hRSFPm+Pf4EZAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,486,1520899200"; d="scan'208";a="189021177"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Jun 2018 13:55:37 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w57DtbTY028756 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 7 Jun 2018 13:55:37 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 09:55:36 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 09:55:36 -0400
From: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
CC: "ietfc@btconnect.com" <ietfc@btconnect.com>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] subscribed-notifications-12
Thread-Index: AQHT19OSvBCDfpubJUuCjcsotTnR4KQIExlQgE1LZgD//7/OEA==
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 13:55:36 +0000
Message-ID: <f4a4bad3ce354732a382c35be8166ba5@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
References: <2b788c22f7ee4af889813b805348d69a@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com> <067301d3d7d3$71bc1820$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <7e405392a4be49abbba13bfa2fb6d38e@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com> <20180607.154342.993031610362957293.mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180607.154342.993031610362957293.mbj@tail-f.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.118.56.228]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/R3H9ZsZ6OrEhfpcmHlWgmtyhe70>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] subscribed-notifications-12
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 13:55:43 -0000

> "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com> wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > Thanks for the review.  You can see the updated draft at:
> > https://github.com/netconf-wg/rfc5277bis/blob/master/draft-ietf-netcon
> > f-subscribed-notifications-13.txt
> >
> > Some details inline...
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: t.petch, April 19, 2018 7:42 AM
> > > To: Eric Voit (evoit) <evoit@cisco.com>; Kent Watsen
> > > <kwatsen@juniper.net>; Alexander Clemm <ludwig@clemm.org>;
> > > netconf@ietf.org
> > > Subject: subscribed-notifications-12
> 
> [...]
> 
> > > There are a number of Informative References which I think should be
> > > Normative namely
> 
> [...]
> 
> > > 7950
> >
> > I believe this one is an informative reference.  I.e., the reference
> > in the YANG model is to an example of analogous behavior from HTTP2.
> > My reading of rfc7950 section 7.21.4 doesn't seem to require a
> > reference to be normative.  If it does, I can move the information
> > into the description.
> 
> 7950 needs to be normative b/c you define a YANG 1.1 module in this
> document.

Updated.   It makes sense that every YANG 1.1 draft should have this as a normative reference.

Eric

> /martin
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > Thanks again,
> > Eric
> >
> >
> > > Tom Petch
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Netconf mailing list
> > Netconf@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
> >

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status