Re: [Netconf] [netconf] Editorial change for draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf

Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> Fri, 01 June 2018 16:11 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C7612D961 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 09:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9xROgA_zLGeS for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 09:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 586EF12DA0A for <netconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 09:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7614; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1527869506; x=1529079106; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=A49G1J1trY3RMP+3KnojvN9DNcNeqXuoqJg24T8Xxfg=; b=MTIh+FkXi75ixPSK+Y/H1kHJra6X2g/HBRLXr/sz6MMWgeCnLO5FByfv 8d2cQGVLmfHGYc8OCN6wBrxa6B+r1TWsXvEZX4m6pE4TITb/g8c9MAosU KRvfLAaqNVQxcTPjIZmSapCcqCW47aTqhWuRffURldw/8fB78/YGkGXtw s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DfBQBrbxFb/wbLJq1cGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJOdWJ/KJhjgVApj1WGbwsYAQqEA0YCggUhOBQBAgEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQJsHAyFKQEBBAEBK0EbCxguJzAGAQwGAgEBgx4CgX8PqSkfhDmDaIFjBYg?= =?us-ascii?q?/gVQ/gTOCaYMRAQGHNAKRJYdHCY5bBoE8hjeFIodbhAqFNIFYIYFSMxoIGxU?= =?us-ascii?q?7gkOLEIU/PjCPagEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,467,1520899200"; d="scan'208,217";a="122967838"
Received: from aer-core-1.cisco.com ([173.38.203.6]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Jun 2018 16:11:32 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.83] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-83.cisco.com [10.63.23.83]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w51GBU5T013119; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 16:11:30 GMT
To: Rohit R Ranade <rohitrranade@huawei.com>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
References: <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BBB3AC2@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com>
From: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <387e825e-d7b9-01c3-d457-c13b797b5bfc@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 17:11:30 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BBB3AC2@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------F19E722C0333333F9969A436"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/Rugo4SZcfUUp7pMo3j3zLUkHUhI>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] [netconf] Editorial change for draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 16:11:50 -0000

Hi Rohit,

I think that this is a useful clarification, but thinking about this 
further, I think that this can probably be stated more generally.  
Hence, I'll merge the proposed update as part of my response to your " 
Editorial change-2 for draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf" thread.

Thanks,
Rob


On 31/05/2018 09:54, Rohit R Ranade wrote:
>
> Change 1:
>
> ================
>
> Section 3.1.1
>
> OLD:
>
> The "config-filter" parameter can be used to retrieve only "config
>
>    true" or "config false" nodes.
>
> NEW:
>
> The "config-filter" parameter can be used to retrieve only "config
>
>    true" or "config false" nodes. Note that if “config-filter” is set 
> to “false”,
>
> configuration ancestors (if any) and list key leafs (if any)
>
> are also returned.
>
> Note:
>
> “retrieve only “config false” nodes maybe misleading. So the use-full 
> text written in RFC 8040 in Example 3 can be re-used here.
>
> With Regards,
>
> Rohit R Ranade
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf