Re: [netconf] WG LC for three drafts

"Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com> Fri, 12 June 2020 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <evoit@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46943A1159 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=FZr7q10z; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=S6P6Kunh
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6WMYNBvvF8gv for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D9F73A0FB5 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8096; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1591983729; x=1593193329; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=N9nZYfWEgKUCYy2kTwY+Y2QxP4clCosniEIkJhzZJA0=; b=FZr7q10zPPMSXjTZue2dKK3mayI658lI6AzQrYAFT7qWYUCP5jXqtiFF sO2XQEHW2jPWj51db56Dc93OP8twP+XRsOcgbqsra50s35XuMHL9PLfEk KIFWb1q10CkzQ1dXPOqp0rdCV9Tfei6HGiMeSLaaPWnHay3DqeA2f/ltV k=;
X-Files: smime.p7s : 3975
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:GksqpRBCmDbhyTqkEYvqUyQJPHJ1sqjoPgMT9pssgq5PdaLm5Zn5IUjD/qw00g3WVJnA5vQCjefK4OjsWm0FtJCGtn1KMJlBTAQMhshemQs8SNWEBkv2IL+PDWQ6Ec1OWUUj8yS9Nk5YS9n3e0bfpDu04CJBUhn6PBB+c+LyHIOahs+r1ue0rpvUZQgAhDe0bb5oahusqgCEvcgNiowkIaE0mRY=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AyAgCuveNe/5BdJa1dCRwBAQEBAQEHAQESAQEEBAEBQIE5BAEBCwGBUVIHbystLywKh2ADjTyJf4ldghCCZoJSA1UEBwEBAQkDAQEYDQgCBAEBg39FAoIrAiQ3Bg4CAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBgRthVsMhXIBAQEBAwEBEC4BASwLAQsEAgEIEQQBAS8CHwYLHQgCBA4FCAYUgwU4gUZNAx8PAQ6odAKBOYhhdIE0gwEBAQWBM1EDgyENC4IHBwMGgTgBgVKBEYRLg1iBRBqBQT+BVIJNPoF5JUkBAYE5LoNFgi2RZogqmWVMCoJZhCaCU4QiiRmFB4JwiRqFGossgheddJFQAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFpI4FWcBU7gmlQFwINjh6DcYUUhUJ0AhIjAgYIAQEDCXyOIQGBEAEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,504,1583193600"; d="p7s'?scan'208";a="510028612"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 12 Jun 2020 17:42:08 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05CHg8C9015754 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:42:08 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 12:42:08 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 12:42:06 -0500
Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 12:42:07 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=dRcOsoLXPL33BgVzKmzIIxMx0T+CJ0KiEY9OUrYCXXlGPpiyGuM6DAXvXqao8c3h/sC9j+05OEuxWYSPNIUcIKLeqvyTGGb8bntTbsK7cOdICSe/aiYRkAHMDZoYJZZjmEA2lxjRQDbIlPpRHi3Ns8yZgeex+tZV1TKTk3JwofaHkm5yRAZDz7JIr3EXKifGOdbYcVq6isT6tU/npUh/AWMzhlQLzfLHsIHph+CKwuv7H14o85ZPC1XgyvI+Knm7pRVcjB57mAtPaWQCzytwb7WiC6JTCUy7rkLMMxDjyB6RymlTQ+I5BszxmcE3M/Ndfi8Ppe/izKcPY1WucN6nrA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=hF3X1M1zPDBMVU/KF5z74AsUFlEU2xam8RvfUgaUSCQ=; b=R91NPoJiVJlLNIkaEZEkxAH5OLlwJXYyQmqgafG8Pc2edGBasXB1thGtULh+otJt4WEMe53ytJQekb9lpdjs7w60eDtdgkDzt92K/BpGOr4G/MzKzOPtzvQ9hr3w6rm20TyiG07UFSPnT24uIHTfFawSuea9XQBb2r87N9uCsB1C7RLzJ6GGchfXxfUE1d7WJGXH0yUyVJu6gL+1wilOJlPs/cIiFW+TVkQAPyjkPPRD+WKT3ipk7jinROTF4kBomqjqDrHdeic3z55Rw6k/gkROZzLN3j3EZF1Yd8QX5zBeg46kPZ7vB9bdSYzOKrN1m2EkFAJZfc5X6M37nxPgig==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=hF3X1M1zPDBMVU/KF5z74AsUFlEU2xam8RvfUgaUSCQ=; b=S6P6KunhmWUn8XBu1JwVzGPqaInzF/DKsnt1aHz6e6Wli8xVsH6O2j7PL+HzLiFKN+Gp6HUCjn76zHU0cEod+MehICnhnU09mvNNvvRf5Nj6H35S2QLy70f3M3ZF8nfyjTf6Qa2AUJaYXAwa3mBw4zZmET56mhktGv9gN7ISrpM=
Received: from BL0PR11MB3122.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:75::32) by MN2PR11MB4616.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:26f::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3088.24; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:42:06 +0000
Received: from BL0PR11MB3122.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::20ac:d8b4:4a4f:4290]) by BL0PR11MB3122.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::20ac:d8b4:4a4f:4290%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3088.025; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:42:06 +0000
From: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
CC: Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [netconf] WG LC for three drafts
Thread-Index: AQHWOThTTo+30icCv0mQD3Parb0A+ajVR//Q
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:42:06 +0000
Message-ID: <BL0PR11MB3122ABE4CF14BAF3805DFF2FA1810@BL0PR11MB3122.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <A1A5BD42-AB3F-477A-B291-81E213A2F0DB@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <A1A5BD42-AB3F-477A-B291-81E213A2F0DB@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: watsen.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;watsen.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.117.76]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8bd64b40-7cce-473d-b29d-08d80ef7ecb1
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4616:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB46165188CB0C69B1BD7E45FCA1810@MN2PR11MB4616.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0432A04947
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: PcY7f/flX7kFJKo9eFYy1+UJ5NwYT6fIfFUWmBl7WFwFFADG5u287o3jv2WI6Q6PG8pVK9ycyUqSZIyKwLwHQNxDaZjpmYXlIcU1v4pYpvMZvxk1wGzqTpRnQR8bQ3NuJikTsQ/dIY2DOSyjO/n18+yzAJ6VE1T68nDU3B0FXcBBMGT0zBdTmBBXUZeRuQGU90NjOWjS/oY4ZeGymqYgaU727CU2kfuGFc5uYwGgk/0vsZblIGLGCz4GdhsXuNNBdTZ3cwUzNwCmpedhZf6EMifWOglOknAfVu4GKTf9aDn7gvcunYcS7fb+JZfvLVSgd50UwtWUnubHXd16PFgeC0MMWWphK8aJoWRxma58ezeUE8Q0jETBr86E+nQmhLrTrhUcQHrJstg5quSJTfqXfTzOVnDr9gg4y8Fjb55ThQxd7Q7FDAe1JH4D0w3H341k8uv9q8cvE3Hoj36ioTC6WoRsTciboVWzRYsUOD/0o9g=
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BL0PR11MB3122.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(136003)(376002)(346002)(396003)(39860400002)(366004)(8936002)(76116006)(66946007)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(66616009)(66476007)(6506007)(26005)(9686003)(7696005)(52536014)(5660300002)(55016002)(71200400001)(8676002)(53546011)(2906002)(186003)(316002)(54906003)(99936003)(966005)(33656002)(83380400001)(4326008)(86362001)(478600001)(15398625002)(43620500001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="SHA1"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_070D_01D640BF.41120700"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 8bd64b40-7cce-473d-b29d-08d80ef7ecb1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 12 Jun 2020 17:42:06.2511 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: STjPrfM116SelhxilR9ljNKVFe5BWrMZswVbuEeT9yCvQdsacly3arYd01+ahUBs
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4616
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.12, xch-aln-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-8.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/T5CEKdxVZSZkh3OJqDKcco9eBOU>
Subject: Re: [netconf] WG LC for three drafts
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:42:12 -0000

Hi Kent,

I have been reading draft-ietf-netconf-crypto-types, and the thread: Virtual
"hum" for the "key generation" issue discussed at virtual meeting.

I have a couple questions on the previous "asymmetric-algorithm-type"  and
what is now in "asymmetric-key-pair-grouping".  My reading is that instead
of the previous ENUMs of -v14, other applications/WGs will now need to
create identities for the various algorithm types.  And this is fine.

If I have this correct, then each of the TCG Algorithm Registry ID values of
TPM2 specifications in Table 9
https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/TPM-Rev-2.0-Part-2-
Structures-01.38.pdf 
could have its own identity.   And there would be no barrier to each of
these identities also having another base identity that might be
"tpm2-algorithm".  In this correct?

If this is correct, my second question is whether there will be an attempt
to ask other YANG models to import these application identities elsewhere?
As you and Rob note in the thread, trying to predict the desired identity
inheritance hierarchy is non-trivial.

Thanks,
Eric

> -----Original Message-----
> From: netconf <netconf-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Mahesh
> Jethanandani
> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 7:48 PM
> To: Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
> Subject: [netconf] WG LC for three drafts
> 
> NETCONF WG,
> 
> The authors of
> 
> - draft-ietf-netconf-crypto-types
> - draft-ietf-netconf-keystore
> - draft-ietf-netconf-trust-anchors
> 
> have indicated that these drafts are ready for Last Call (LC).
> 
> This kicks of a 2 week WG LC for the three drafts. Please review and send
any
> comments to the WG mailing list or by responding to this e-mail. Comments
> can be statements such as, I read/reviewed the document and believe it is
> ready for publication, or I have concerns about the document. For the
latter,
> please indicate what your concerns are.
> 
> Any reports on implementation status or plans to implement are also very
> useful.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Mahesh Jethanandani (as co-chair)
> mjethanandani@gmail.com
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list
> netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf