[netconf] Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-trace-ctx-extension-01
Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Thu, 31 October 2024 04:17 UTC
Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D8CC14F6EA; Wed, 30 Oct 2024 21:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gy_h4DlGJFYL; Wed, 30 Oct 2024 21:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20C65C14F6AD; Wed, 30 Oct 2024 21:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e2dcf4b153so395854a91.1; Wed, 30 Oct 2024 21:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1730348275; x=1730953075; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7IXdUjrYryGoE38Kghb69jxTKrnYrHbqmzFvwmMsZII=; b=QKTOYKv6P3mEVB/lbRlxPw/G/Ka5nWbZavxikS2YnWba5Ar1mWpeyBw1wJhYG606Ec p4bPigT9TCdDy0BO70NOZLTjlLONprj0Gzb3Uvx27PxVnBdlJP/pxmkgasn9W+kB3c5m 0ckg5DerKV/PSEFlwVKr53T9v/G2FQshsX6xLpo85/Gbj7hJqDkvvNFbleKMv1fRZHD6 8l8daCiTazZY7lCWY9unFB/Jbh4hllgrEerxI5Q7Bge0RK6CGbL58S/cYbZivfGp4XuH yWR0uTKlyG2IajOh4NqqIMQCcdKftCdRk8qVGQ3Q2cQEF/c8oHSnqvVvOMBubeEe9Kn1 6Flw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1730348275; x=1730953075; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=7IXdUjrYryGoE38Kghb69jxTKrnYrHbqmzFvwmMsZII=; b=IHAFlB9n0oqd2E2TcwOprKG46Pv8AawODPvyFkj96iIXB4YdTnhD0HPBqd5y4juGri n/DYeqtjH2VYcdBWvucUoMXl9vfDoQnnSDY/lEM0ih5bjCjemfIWHrI2qIuDOrHAV8S9 pb6KZi4uFcaVxMZwQk3V1MZXzSjwvf/7tOeFYXf3hvgK0p2RWF+WgiUTGJJBv+R9/zGg 5vMudCPgXiPNJ1A9Dk8xsGTcVQDaXCbrcuphgjOQUgdTFE61/uyNzQpWvBxwI47l/tx1 oZLT0Z6F3Ah7QMB/WBCyePpBWDYBYV0pSp4emRGuHv6sjO/qK+Rbgi56mRgGTY8c4sVk 4HEA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV4dqMDoe6n1vE+jb9tBb0asnG/W7UVQ97ng3CBR2HFpwFinCMLW0PhEnAupsG/25ulCLv+qgQaKw==@ietf.org, AJvYcCVn8FtM6kgOOYcF/33ILFOCkEg4eA23fZg5wZe0QuS8ln2LpiMIt9WznTKutGUe7HkiQdl5zvA349xu@ietf.org, AJvYcCW04QUTrfRsvSj6nlTodZBrBeDl4rBIB/h+RXEZyO8mysvdGqzhuAWHuyRsufSOlDul3o8M7VcNQg==@ietf.org, AJvYcCXu2m29gbDon02xnvAfB0bN6AgOTYVV0SvNndPTjlQ9cvijrRkXoXgQWbVROeaNKuPeYuEJdcmTKUpsLnVtdapSOcICJAvs0bwjVtRSt5pcjSkWUmtJxpEGpZI=@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx38gdcTqQ5XVxCwtfpwzy0ehil0qecsCDdjpWn1O2A55RApYLf lEiB/+gCNhPjizRNOV1MwHr8K7cxli1oKyKmtH+k4aQhGSXxFboEpMonJwocquOGLVHT2D9mI0t AnjsZr/+z5lry8bgZe3mDxjahWzx4+w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFb4d+Bd492zZ70uS32BPImp2T3fQrMqz9pWaSq1QGbqTOdK+LYiW3zMaOuusqPZrSEyiPerG/p23u6QOgUwf4=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1e50:b0:2e0:74c9:ecf1 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e92ce4e833mr6316710a91.10.1730348275346; Wed, 30 Oct 2024 21:17:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <173009941080.317154.1949281531203590277@dt-datatracker-6cdf944fd9-dld6h> <7EAB75E6-BCBB-4FCF-950B-26AE069DB827@gmail.com> <ACD269B2-8198-4C3E-A7A6-82D72C1800F6@dev.terastrm.net>
In-Reply-To: <ACD269B2-8198-4C3E-A7A6-82D72C1800F6@dev.terastrm.net>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 00:17:44 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV2iyMfntvtevejQ=kfSVWpTzhpHTv3aYArpS4fZQz+GYQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kristian Larsson <kll@dev.terastrm.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004a36540625be1abb"
Message-ID-Hash: 63N322ZOS4QV5UT4HT7IRBQSOH4Z43OA
X-Message-ID-Hash: 63N322ZOS4QV5UT4HT7IRBQSOH4Z43OA
X-MailFrom: hayabusagsm@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-netconf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: ops-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netconf-trace-ctx-extension.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, NETCONF WG <netconf@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [netconf] Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-trace-ctx-extension-01
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/TAI4aRSUSfcvhVxiweN1yOXjk_Q>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:netconf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:netconf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:netconf-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Kristian Thanks for the explanation. I don’t think we need to respin the draft. After reading the text again both the old and new are close to the same so I am good with progressing the draft. Thank you Gyan On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 9:51 PM Kristian Larsson <kll@dev.terastrm.net> wrote: > Hi Gyan, > > thanks Mahesh for the explanation, it’s exactly right. We don’t update the > HTTP spec at all, we borrow its concepts and apply them to netconf. The w3c > trace context headers are sent as XML attributes for NETCONF. > > I don’t understand the minor issue you list Gyan. What about port 830, > SOAP 832 & 833? Regardless if NETCONF is over SSH, TLS, SOAP (in turn over > BEEP or HTTPS), it still sends XML encoded RPCs and the trace context XML > attributes are encoded in there. I don’t think we need to explicitly > mention or deal with the details of the lower layer transports!? > > The abstract changes read very similarly to me, do you really think this > warrants another spin at this point? > > Kind regards, > Kristian. > > > > On 29 Oct 2024, at 19:30, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > [Speaking as a contributor] > > > > Hi Gyan, > > > >> On Oct 28, 2024, at 12:10 AM, Gyan Mishra via Datatracker < > noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > >> > >> Reviewer: Gyan Mishra > >> Review result: Not Ready > >> > >> Summary: > >> This document defines how to propagate trace context information across > the > >> Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF), that enables distributed > tracing > >> scenarios. It is an adaption of the HTTP-based W3C specification. > >> > >> I reviewed draft revision -01 and the draft is almost ready for > publication but > >> has some minor issue below. > >> > >> Major issue: > >> None > >> > >> Minor issues: > >> > >> Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) uses the Secure Shell (SSH) > transport > >> layer as its default mechanism using default port 830, SOAP port 833 or > HTTP > >> port 832. > >> > >> Abstract recommended change > >> Old: > >> > >> This document defines how to propagate trace context information across > the > >> Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF), that enables distributed > tracing > >> scenarios. It is an adaption of the HTTP-based W3C specification.¶ > >> > >> New: > >> > >> This document defines how to propagate trace context information using > Network > >> Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) push in order to enable distributed > tracing > >> scenarios. It is an adaption of the HTTP-based W3C specification. > >> > >> W3C owns the HTTP specification so how is this draft changing the W3C > http > >> specification? > >> > >> Netconf can use http but it’s not changing the http specification > correct ? > >> > >> In the introduction see this paragraph > >> > >> The W3C has defined two HTTP headers for context propagation that are > useful in > >> use case scenarios of distributed systems like the ones defined in > [RFC8309]. > >> This document defines an extension to the NETCONF protocol to add the > same > >> concepts and enable trace context propagation over NETCONF. > >> > >> So we are defining an extension to Netconf protocols in section 2 > related to > >> W3Cs HTTP specification so in that way is this draft actually updating > HTTP > >> specification as well for the two new header types? > > > > I do not think the document is updating the HTTP specification. All it > says that the <rpc> operation in NETCONF uses the HTTP like symantics to > send information to the other end. For example: > > > > <rpc xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0" message-id="1" > > xmlns:w3ctc="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:w3ctc:1.0" > > w3ctc:traceparent= > > "00-4bf92f3577b34da6a3ce929d0e0e4736-00f067aa0ba902b7-01"> > > <get-config/> > > </rpc> > > > > The above operation is a NETCONF operation. It is using HTTP like trace > context header format [1], but in no way is changing the HTTP protocol. HTH. > > > > Cheers. > > > >> > >> Nits: > >> None > > > > [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/trace-context/ > > > > Mahesh Jethanandani > > mjethanandani@gmail.com > > > > > > > >
- [netconf] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-n… Gyan Mishra via Datatracker
- [netconf] Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ie… Mahesh Jethanandani
- [netconf] Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ie… Kristian Larsson
- [netconf] Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ie… Gyan Mishra