[netconf] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8639 (6366)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 24 December 2020 14:33 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D2F3A1281 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 06:33:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yw6jrHvex8tf for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 06:33:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DE8E3A1280 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 06:33:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 0CF77F40709; Thu, 24 Dec 2020 06:32:50 -0800 (PST)
To: evoit@cisco.com, ludwig@clemm.org, alberto.gonzalez@microsoft.com, einarnn@cisco.com, ambtripa@cisco.com, warren@kumari.net, rwilton@cisco.com, kent+ietf@watsen.net, mjethanandani@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: muly_i@rad.com, netconf@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20201224143250.0CF77F40709@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 06:32:50 -0800 (PST)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/U0gIBvHeY_soxmg47j06kEFbZEU>
Subject: [netconf] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8639 (6366)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 14:33:12 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8639,
"Subscription to YANG Notifications".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6366

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Muly Ilan <muly_i@rad.com>

Section: 4.

Original Text
-------------
  feature subtree {
    description
      "This feature indicates support for YANG subtree filtering.";
    reference
      "RFC 6241: Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF),
                 Section 6";
  }

  feature supports-vrf {
    description
      "This feature indicates that a publisher supports VRF
       configuration for configured subscriptions.  VRF support for
       dynamic subscriptions does not require this feature.";
    reference
      "RFC 8529: YANG Data Model for Network Instances,
                 Section 6";
  }

Corrected Text
--------------
  feature subtree {
    description
      "This feature indicates support for YANG subtree filtering.";
    reference
      "RFC 6241: Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF),
                 Section 6";
  }

  feature supports-vrf {
    description
      "This feature indicates that a publisher supports VRF
       configuration for configured subscriptions.  VRF support for
       dynamic subscriptions does not require this feature.";
    reference
      "RFC 8529: YANG Data Model for Network Instances,
                 Section 6";
  }

Notes
-----
In the HTML version the two hyperlinks "Section 6" (for 'subtree' feature and for 'supports-vrf' feature) point to wrong RFCs.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8639 (draft-ietf-netconf-subscribed-notifications-26)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Subscription to YANG Notifications
Publication Date    : September 2019
Author(s)           : E. Voit, A. Clemm, A. Gonzalez Prieto, E. Nilsen-Nygaard, A. Tripathy
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Network Configuration
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG