[netconf] [Errata Verified] RFC8650 (6379)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 05 January 2021 10:06 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 955433A09C5; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 02:06:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VZJd2OIxps-Z; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 02:06:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EF323A09C1; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 02:06:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 363FDF40760; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 02:06:05 -0800 (PST)
To: muly_i@rad.com, evoit@cisco.com, rrahman@cisco.com, einarnn@cisco.com, ludwig@clemm.org, andy@yumaworks.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rwilton@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org, netconf@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20210105100605.363FDF40760@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 02:06:05 -0800 (PST)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/UpAXWxIALSpI6-X0qHgIj-SsNy4>
Subject: [netconf] [Errata Verified] RFC8650 (6379)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 10:06:09 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC8650,
"Dynamic Subscription to YANG Events and Datastores over RESTCONF". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6379

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Muly Ilan <muly_i@rad.com>
Date Reported: 2021-01-03
Verified by: Rob Wilton (IESG)

Section: A.1.1

Original Text
-------------
   Upon receipt of the successful response, the subscriber does a GET to
   the provided URI to start the flow of notification messages.  When
   the publisher receives this, the subscription is moved to the active
   state (c).

   GET /restconf/subscriptions/22

             Figure 5: "establish-subscription" Subsequent POST

Corrected Text
--------------
   Upon receipt of the successful response, the subscriber does a GET to
   the provided URI to start the flow of notification messages.  When
   the publisher receives this, the subscription is moved to the active
   state (c).

   GET /restconf/subscriptions/22

             Figure 5: "establish-subscription" Subsequent GET

Notes
-----
Substitute POST by GET in the figure caption

--------------------------------------
RFC8650 (draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif-15)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Dynamic Subscription to YANG Events and Datastores over RESTCONF
Publication Date    : November 2019
Author(s)           : E. Voit, R. Rahman, E. Nilsen-Nygaard, A. Clemm, A. Bierman
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Network Configuration
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG