Re: [netconf] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-05

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Mon, 04 November 2019 14:17 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28331200E7; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 06:17:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o2PO1awAhoM0; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 06:17:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D48E120099; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 06:17:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 7452215E36F566E04083; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 14:17:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from lhreml718-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.69) by lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 14:17:19 +0000
Received: from lhreml718-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.69) by lhreml718-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.69) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 14:17:19 +0000
Received: from DGGEML421-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.38) by lhreml718-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.69) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 14:17:19 +0000
Received: from DGGEML531-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.209]) by dggeml421-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.199.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 22:17:12 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
CC: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netconf] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-05
Thread-Index: AdWTGad/hoXGC87vTem9+ie/gPo2nw==
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 14:17:12 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAA93E6464@dggeml531-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.134.31.203]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/W38tBC6euKRghYkG_ftjBKXZx20>
Subject: Re: [netconf] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-05
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 14:17:24 -0000

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Martin Bjorklund [mailto:mbj@tail-f.com] 
发送时间: 2019年11月4日 21:57
收件人: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
抄送: netconf@ietf.org; draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default@ietf.org
主题: Re: [netconf] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-05

Hi,

Trimming to open issues...

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> wrote:
> Thanks Martin, see reply inline below.
> 
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Martin Bjorklund [mailto:mbj@tail-f.com]

> o  Abstract and Introduction
> 
>   These both contain:
> 
>     The reset operation may be used e.g. during initial
>     zero-touch configuration
> 
>   and in the Introduction there's a reference to RFC 8572.
> 
>   But what does this actually mean?
> [Qin]: It means the key word zero-touch comes from RFC8572.

I get that part.  I was wondering about the meaning of the sentence.
How can "reset" be used "during initial zero-touch configuration"?

[Qin]: I think "reset" can be used at the beginning of session setup or in the middle of session when the existing configuration
Has fatal error.
Maybe change it into "before initial zero-touch configuration"?

> o  Section 4
> 
>   The YANG module contains the boilerplate text from RFC 8174, but the
>   module doesn't use 8174-language, so I suggest the boilerplate text
>   is removed.
> [Qin]: "MAY" key word is used in this draft, I am not sure to remove boilerplate text.

But MAY isn't used in the *YANG module*.  The boilerplate in section
1.1 should stay, but the boilerplate in the YANG module should be removed.

[Qin]: I see, will remove it from the module.

/martin