IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netconf] WGLC for draft-ietf-netconf-notification-capabilities

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Thu, 24 October 2019 19:26 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275FC120047 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:26:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z-YotXK3oXaQ for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x434.google.com (mail-pf1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21A73120025 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x434.google.com with SMTP id x28so2278454pfi.12 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=7529M5+LKZOzS2/dh5eqRJrAK6wF5LVQ25zxUvKDcpM=; b=abV4f9jKajeDmoMZDVOMsh27O/IPShu6WuOV7Im9fLFylZOWMrDhmtP6ei7DwWT8Sg idt4PDB7CBETEnO8YD4FKt8feSmpvyks5tqQWLchQJGigrIyTTWEHdyoAKDoZfNx8jT+ TcLRkh3wCEZlIU8FBKMsmLJ4MXMYQXfrMGOyky6lHR8/BHO4kWzWzUgwgmJFF88IXced R0+XN7nHv+6L4GQ19M2zF424s7cBF+R54TXleXEWSJSa6xRNK22YuVmBgcqd1uFsecRb Prfh+BV5yslhS0UfweUHdB1TCBYcMX7aVXPO3O8GQj65P1OERdZTS6FduMVoScSJeZsB novA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to :in-reply-to:message-id; bh=7529M5+LKZOzS2/dh5eqRJrAK6wF5LVQ25zxUvKDcpM=; b=gDa+qHAIuL/kncJlXtH6FbM8e1vrqAuY0E5QE2xdt/GzHFx8o4lc6Ld+yZc7JIVbky Q4MGaSb5RYYjWZXrOHleyeSnzuraGel5vZ80neTjm9RxQ1ywK4bvmoVqfpuESC2tK0zY YWR8EnodjGLUpy5axeo3z7QGGiA7amthCo9LbRAlYIvCOn5DkqvZrAavxka4zvZxUJh0 syaIsVOMvNvspjxFEadIctpXlq8HLuP73xBNdkYAX+skzuI91SfxM+Ssi8K8ceXhlPLr bxobG09TTWlkgiD+8sPtGWRSf6DckGmghxObKG/kn7cBDyCRY3EE0M5i32e+Ryoz2E/E Ou3w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXeZ6RrrhaARRRq2I2IwvNIbuN/FIlQVGCimh59pnUWGziaxbtl pXAOQ8BH6lCcBNwQJXuI+HLBIm2m
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzaMfT58fJeIvi/UFkU1RIO+eqvVWJp+/a62q90U9ucRVH98C2jYUZJuG0kWpd7diPfKlclAA==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:6c49:: with SMTP id h70mr3363498pgc.123.1571945157958; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:25:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.33.123.155] ([66.170.99.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k9sm26330869pfk.72.2019.10.24.12.25.56 for <netconf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_73F500CC-CF7B-436B-AB59-4D6A091B7FCA"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:25:55 -0700
References: <D3B39347-DFB7-4BEE-8B22-0EE07AEB1F5A@gmail.com> <4F49DF08-B7FC-4EBD-9D6B-7BC329E50334@gmail.com> <6234A83E-D730-4978-BD0D-7E8085F949B5@gmail.com>
To: Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <6234A83E-D730-4978-BD0D-7E8085F949B5@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <974EB590-9D43-4454-BC85-37D607E0B75D@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/XVdWn1Zwmb3mocOLAgB7tyFWRhE>
Subject: Re: [netconf] WGLC for draft-ietf-netconf-notification-capabilities
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 19:26:01 -0000

Balasz has posted an update to the draft that addresses comments received during LC. If you provided comments during that period, please evaluate if your comments have been addressed.

Thanks

Mahesh (and Kent).

> On Oct 2, 2019, at 12:17 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> This concludes the LC on the draft. Authors, please address all the comments provided as part of LC, and post the updated draft. 
> 
> Thanks. 
> 
> Mahesh & Kent. 
> 
> On Sep 24, 2019, at 10:50 AM, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com <mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>> We were supposed to have closed on the WGLC today. However, between the document becoming a WG item and it going into LC, we have not received too many comments on the draft. As such, we are extending the LC by another week. Please review the draft and provide any comments you might have.
>> 
>> Mahesh & Kent (as co-chairs)
>> 
>> 
>>> On Sep 10, 2019, at 3:39 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com <mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Authors have published -04 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-notification-capabilities-04> version of the draft, which addresses comments they received in IETF 105. If you provided comments please check to make sure your comments have been addressed. At this point, the authors believe that the document is ready for WGLC.
>>> 
>>> This therefore starts a two week LC, ending on September 24th. Please provide any technical comments you might have on the document. If you believe the document is not ready for LC, please state your reasons.
>>> 
>>> We will issue a IPR poll separately. 
>>> 
>>> Mahesh & Kent (as co-chairs)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email