Re: [Netconf] Adoption poll for crypto-types and trust-anchors

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Wed, 02 May 2018 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97DC12D94E for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 May 2018 10:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YkXegP0915Jy for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 May 2018 10:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22e.google.com (mail-pg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B00012D94D for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 May 2018 10:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 82-v6so11149519pge.11 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 May 2018 10:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=OpSkL48xfV/yf7x8oa28aycyd9yydlTfawPSQ/cIjvg=; b=jN0UrwlTpa99NLcHPgTTOtjDDOdEIssJssswrr8kNThOjQyBr8DruUujwLQC90aOfg pYCoSPhQBhcbDuztK1h9Jm18SC/NE9KvTBCDaPMpl4UkIUoaa8Q/ZxrcBZg/LIWukqWC 8hYGGGawKbpw+16DZOPrKOiTEVOnPkS86jsV/+vt8Hxp/VV136U6ICZU89irXWhjl3Va UEHkB4EeBWEx65nuC7EMZr1q+9DZgs0OaraVgH+sFTnNPRXp9CvP0217GdBJ2p/wKEOJ 1hfxkkvXSmEmKfXpN9YHLuPLZanWGeATuHuPlOiFWDl/SHKbtvDOlaSTSWL7sFpzzDwc quZA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=OpSkL48xfV/yf7x8oa28aycyd9yydlTfawPSQ/cIjvg=; b=mMLybOB51KTQ+k76Mk9GzpnU960aazFDC3Bt8cpStAPMw22AejC6WSXbwGo3tUmz5m vq3uHnHMgJAYLhHJccrvQ2rfhZLIuUG05D1FX1vShI8QNbEpia673Db52zsyMm3iltTG DM7UQxnl6RCj54vfi03kOQsb/dIHBxlyZMKyBcCaHWtCIcjXysdfAoZB99yasPYVmFaQ 8t1WXP2oA2ylkb7DZRdBslJ+Bei3zDYCZc6+eTkp5MuXqSnloi1vhkaSSCoI4MtT0clE Nqs40wDzbMz5P+OAzyvHJ5az5LWU2iBHRr0QCbCw9Gen9eyWLhvJ3e4yBrS5wnFfp184 Zy7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDJlfhFHeCw6RQQhjW9y81PWoMY8/q2gP7Da6qjBhRSK4+SV/EF 4ln2cJr7I6EPwaTZHZ8bLmylc/NE
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZrbrrBwK42Mv2m6CLLqGjUw/pIO+J6gpMOR5OR5OyaIIHrTxCYpkGm9sMJVE5AmMK+jkYJt3g==
X-Received: by 2002:a65:4784:: with SMTP id e4-v6mr16566126pgs.196.1525283180048; Wed, 02 May 2018 10:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4700:1280:993e:d722:3827:3883? ([2601:647:4700:1280:993e:d722:3827:3883]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q62sm14851290pfd.172.2018.05.02.10.46.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 02 May 2018 10:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <B2A92785-5144-40CE-BFF5-A1B29867995B@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F066DF32-D353-44E1-8569-8BC5575323DA"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 10:46:18 -0700
In-Reply-To: <D972EDFC-AEF6-4BC7-82A9-BE1DA350FDAA@juniper.net>
Cc: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
References: <D972EDFC-AEF6-4BC7-82A9-BE1DA350FDAA@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/XeVyMFOY2blw5Xz5cwcnUSEqEZw>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Adoption poll for crypto-types and trust-anchors
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 17:46:23 -0000

Support adoption.

// as contributor.

> On May 1, 2018, at 2:57 PM, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> [I'll get the ball rolling, please, others chime in too]
> 
> I support the adoption of these two drafts to replace the existing keystore draft.
> 
> Regarding the "certificate-expiration" notification defined in ietf-crypto-types, I would like to discuss removing it, or moving it to be a descendent of the "certificates-grouping" grouping (also in ietf-crypto-types) and maybe also place a copy of the notification in the ietf-trust-anchors module.  That said, I don't like having several otherwise identical notifications in different namespaces, but I do like how the server can incrementally add support for expirations on a feature-by-feature basis.
> 
> Kent // contributor
> 
> 
> ===== original message =====
> 
> This is the start of a *two* week poll for adopting the following two drafts as working group documents, specifically to replace draft-ietf-netconf-keystore, which would be removed as a working group document: 
> 
>  draft-kwatsen-netconf-crypto-types-00
>  draft-kwatsen-netconf-trust-anchors-00
> 
> This call for adoption is the result of the Keystore draft presentation given in London.  When the various options were discussed, most preferred to move forward with these two drafts, as opposed to looking to do more factoring or extending to scope to include things not needed by our various client/server drafts.  No one expressed interest in moving forward with draft-ietf-netconf-keystore.  While we could separately confirm this result again on the list, we believe that an adoption call more efficiently achieves two goals at once.
> 
> Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
> 
> Kent (and Mahesh and Ignas)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netconf&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=qXS002RrOOkzqTDm70cWjg7eJeWqtpC_anWUcc9a_3I&s=1W689R8ht-U3FoffJ5uTT24SAPRtiQ9a9B3VxQxM_Wg&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netconf&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=qXS002RrOOkzqTDm70cWjg7eJeWqtpC_anWUcc9a_3I&s=1W689R8ht-U3FoffJ5uTT24SAPRtiQ9a9B3VxQxM_Wg&e=>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org <mailto:Netconf@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>
Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com