[Netconf] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6241 (3569)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 27 March 2013 14:01 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE44321F910C for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 07:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.967
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.967 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.633, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IxcQCsc-g5VB for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 07:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1189921F910D for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 07:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id F33A7B1E002; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 07:01:21 -0700 (PDT)
To: rob.enns@gmail.com, mbj@tail-f.com, j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de, andy.bierman@brocade.com, bclaise@cisco.com, joelja@bogus.com, bertietf@bwijnen.net, mehmet.ersue@nsn.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20130327140122.F33A7B1E002@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 07:01:21 -0700
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 07:13:56 -0700
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, netconf@ietf.org
Subject: [Netconf] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6241 (3569)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:01:54 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6241, "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6241&eid=3569 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Xiang Li <xiangli@seguesoft.com> Section: 1.2 Original Text ------------- (2) The Messages layer provides a simple, transport-independent framing mechanism for encoding RPCs and notifications. Section 4 documents the RPC messages, and [RFC5717] documents notifications Corrected Text -------------- (2) The Messages layer provides a simple, transport-independent framing mechanism for encoding RPCs and notifications. Section 4 documents the RPC messages, and [RFC5277] documents notifications Notes ----- RFC5717 Partial Lock Remote Procedure Call (RPC) for NETCONF RFC5277 NETCONF Event Notifications Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6241 (draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis-10) -------------------------------------- Title : Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) Publication Date : June 2011 Author(s) : R. Enns, Ed., M. Bjorklund, Ed., J. Schoenwaelder, Ed., A. Bierman, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Network Configuration Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Netconf] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6241 (35… RFC Errata System