IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] subscribed-notifications-12

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Thu, 07 June 2018 13:43 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E7A1310D4 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 06:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xcecynvOu5-t for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 06:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FEE1310CC for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 06:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [173.38.220.61]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97D0D1AE0309; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 15:43:42 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:43:42 +0200
Message-Id: <20180607.154342.993031610362957293.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: evoit@cisco.com
Cc: ietfc@btconnect.com, netconf@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <7e405392a4be49abbba13bfa2fb6d38e@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
References: <2b788c22f7ee4af889813b805348d69a@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com> <067301d3d7d3$71bc1820$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <7e405392a4be49abbba13bfa2fb6d38e@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/_tXTRx4QdUtZkHO-6GmhF3bQm1M>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] subscribed-notifications-12
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 13:43:48 -0000

"Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com> wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> Thanks for the review.  You can see the updated draft at:
> https://github.com/netconf-wg/rfc5277bis/blob/master/draft-ietf-netconf-subscribed-notifications-13.txt 
> 
> Some details inline...
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: t.petch, April 19, 2018 7:42 AM
> > To: Eric Voit (evoit) <evoit@cisco.com>; Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>;
> > Alexander Clemm <ludwig@clemm.org>; netconf@ietf.org
> > Subject: subscribed-notifications-12

[...]

> > There are a number of Informative References which I think should be
> > Normative namely

[...]

> > 7950
> 
> I believe this one is an informative reference.  I.e., the reference
> in the YANG model is to an example of analogous behavior from HTTP2.
> My reading of rfc7950 section 7.21.4 doesn't seem to require a
> reference to be normative.  If it does, I can move the information
> into the description.

7950 needs to be normative b/c you define a YANG 1.1 module in this
document.


/martin



> 
> Thanks again,
> Eric
> 
>  
> > Tom Petch
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email