Re: [Netconf] YangPush now

"Tim Jenkins (timjenki)" <timjenki@cisco.com> Mon, 16 July 2018 23:10 UTC

Return-Path: <timjenki@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81A2130EDF for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 16:10:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ifdiz8nUik8F for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 16:10:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDB23126BED for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 16:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2280; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1531782653; x=1532992253; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=yWruNtEZ6w6NtOIW1d8cZWw1n/qkM61rtBt5vMs6N9A=; b=W+pXJHJo3JFhFA5sy0+nQ8XantrRQmahzrdaT+PmnU1qgAR78vfc1F/T KLXXGUHwuwfovVDtAS6MLitPJZStO1YWutZlhsjMML0kVDuuQKOU+7eOM lWn+72ABnL6xpBziy30WQd/Z1wDkxyKODLbOYtsPjPcHx/0dnHsWw+tly U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DoAQBRJU1b/4wNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYMfKmN/KAqDc4gEjDyCDIM4kgGBegsYC4QDRhmCSiE0GAECAQECAQECbRwBC4U2AQEBAQIBAQEhERoYCAsFDQEIGAICCBsDAgQlCgEUARIEDgEEARwEgn8BgXcID6kkgS6KRIELh3eBVz+BESeCaoMOCwEBAQEYgUYXgmoxgiQCmVwJAo8lgUOEEYgRkW0CERSBJB04JoEscBU7KgGCPgkKghIXegEJgkGFFIU+bwEPjG2BGgEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,363,1526342400"; d="scan'208";a="144019249"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jul 2018 23:10:53 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (xch-rtp-015.cisco.com [64.101.220.155]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w6GNAqnT026324 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 16 Jul 2018 23:10:53 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 19:10:52 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-011.cisco.com ([64.101.220.151]) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com ([64.101.220.151]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 19:10:52 -0400
From: "Tim Jenkins (timjenki)" <timjenki@cisco.com>
To: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] YangPush now
Thread-Index: AQHUHVo97/1MCRrcckGjuypYd3RC8w==
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 23:10:52 +0000
Message-ID: <2E1BAD12-EFF2-4E35-B232-57A4C4490989@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.252.222]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <2B07529A350E79409302C78F79FB172D@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/cMMPUwGd60BZEnAYpyabN6vxlgE>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] YangPush now
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 23:10:57 -0000

Hi,

As an implementor of the drafts, I suggest enough already: we've been going down this path for quite some time.

Please publish both sets (dynamic and configured, and SN and YP) together.

Thanks,

Tim

> Hi,
> 
> It might be useful (at least to me), if the draft authors could explicitly indicate what their preference is, and also which of the choices below they think would lead to the work completing most quickly.
>
> Thanks,
> Rob
>
>
> On 12/07/2018 19:48, Kent Watsen wrote:
> I would like to strongly +1 retaining the configured subscriptions 
> (not necessarily in the Push draft itself for the sake of expediting 
> WGLC or
> modularity)
> Ah, so here's another hum question: with or without yang push.
>
> hums now are:
>
>  1. dynamic subscriptions ~ configured subscriptions
>   a. dynamic first, then configured (published sequentially)
>  b. dynamic and configure together (published in parallel)
>
>   2. subscribed-notifications ~ yang-push
>     a. SN first, then YP  (published sequentially)
>     b. SN and YP together (published in parallel)
>
> Eric/Alex: please include a slide with this somewhere in your preso.
>
> Thanks,
> Kent // chair





_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
mailto:Netconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf



-- 
Cisco Systems Canada Co.
2000 Innovation Drive
Kanata, ON, Canada, K2K 3E8
Preferences <http://www.cisco.com/offer/subscribe/?sid=000478326>
Unsubscribe <http://www.cisco.com/offer/unsubscribe/?sid=000478327>
Privacy <http://www.cisco.com/web/siteassets/legal/privacy.html>