IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Netconf] draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf review

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Tue, 15 May 2018 08:36 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A341120721 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 May 2018 01:36:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CaOavnkQsB1u for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 May 2018 01:36:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 982A712D77A for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 May 2018 01:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id f6-v6so17857163wmc.4 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 May 2018 01:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :to; bh=N+dxoN/VUQore307TzEgjaqATJg3Y7JISKYUsXZ26S8=; b=CwJK4wFgwY+e8UZ66FAlLF9IlqEMJEFGdqZC9k8WV6mBD3/w+wwUk6lfkeMlCllgZR ysgEFwe6q0wdGnIP21Y8JI39MGvVE8b+92G4iCAsXdmURnIEfWatpEQEktrdR4ArTC7i VNAknkOGqcAbhU08FijZFPhhWGP3gitxai+/1p7CFEoJy58rtOKWyHZ6MEMtCmxOv1A9 X4gCMk1KzHB7RDSNWGuvQ7nwvcr4eHaRAbNJXJtzcCtSWDYgMwxCsVNGnlhUt/H4R5JL BEqAe7KEm2T92SwMJYutKAQAOcXqFdIX/bjYBvfsvIv5fRqKUGnSq75apV7dbDxgQN58 dUSw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:to; bh=N+dxoN/VUQore307TzEgjaqATJg3Y7JISKYUsXZ26S8=; b=F1bEHwnjlaPvPkUVPXSgl2n7xGdW3x6M90XO7+zc/AZu03x1zzyVvda5XmE8xJzlxV 7/RV56Hyp7xn6MLwOqzV5BsaIrCIlyTZt/25r8gdaz2JOjfIuQftleyOm9uoTXOtt3Tb lMd3t3gW/zJoLrgqk9GP6kg29flYNzbpYiKDGYHNIxisgOVsZww2pW62xzVIxxbO3gZl 8yuOP5z6WuTdoB/ISG3+z4x0DXVVg5ziq3pjre7YuykHyj0K6F57SM0+eE7dOkv12ZoR 2wB52BG8pZBBZwUvLkEAkyq7HojDKX36Mb/Yi237/MwSVB4FTBtTDkOlNoYJnxtGQHZ8 bj5w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwfhtDwgjK4aZjQcQ9sj1b/PdDnSfHTvojPc1S4eF253NGDOX0dH 8zO0cfb9bXfZX1eIefQQhdH6Rj5Q
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqEFHAXxHYIGsv1C2WjSZEPrUOI173orsyZp7bdvVWD12i+9thWmitLIIoDBFQ2Kf3vUmXL6g==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:911:: with SMTP id 17-v6mr6601141wmj.5.1526373378856; Tue, 15 May 2018 01:36:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.28.7.36] ([195.238.226.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q2-v6sm13801155wrj.57.2018.05.15.01.36.17 for <netconf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 15 May 2018 01:36:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
Message-Id: <69877EC3-DE3E-4428-A2A2-56A2AC29CDCD@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 10:36:16 +0200
To: Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/daU9fHJg239VWxyoX5BYt1gl_FU>
Subject: [Netconf] draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf review
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 08:36:48 -0000

A quick review of the draft has revealed the following issue and question.

1. A run of pyang on the model reveals the following:

> pyang --ietf ietf-netconf-nmda@2018-04-20.yang 
ietf-netconf-nmda@2018-04-20.yang:205: warning: RFC 6087: 4.10,4.12: statement "enum" should have a "description” substatement

2. This is a follow-up to the discussion on the mailing list. Reading through this draft, RFC7950, RFC6020, and rfc7895bis, it is not clear if a NETCONF server that wants to support both YANG 1.0 and YANG 1.1, needs to do from a schema advertisement perspective. Does it advertise the schemas as part of <hello> and as part of yang-library:1.1? Does it advertise both YANG 1.0 and 1.1 models in both the modes?


Mahesh Jethanandani // as shepherd

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email