Re: [Netconf] WG adoption poll draft-zheng-netconf-udp-pub-channel-00

Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com> Tue, 22 August 2017 10:38 UTC

Return-Path: <giles.heron@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3FC132954 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 03:38:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uR1KIautP-_0 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 03:38:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22e.google.com (mail-wr0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51108132951 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 03:38:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id k46so46781660wre.2 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 03:38:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=FBLSOCsxwWKv4kAkTEgBZ/LI5eL8yjJEf+jYjcpMc0w=; b=YSWd81fn7Vh77j++nulc5o72Yq0+ynk7sWoWnp9nyRlXvRo7LEDw9B+g60sJVGBeSs X0FYEVr6wvtKLcYCsyIX7SepaUZ0VkzjObEhuW7MLeVu1yYc4lbQ2uYMRkIqV1uJHAMG tSQkRHmiF26PErZ+zR3WtX4+ProGl7gObuylPMSGWcZlaePNAWT8VyelHuRIIejTrFRj ZcVvAZ5MuMvLFKiu3HBkl3JIwN2y0sn0u9FU8vBFEdeHznv1qNTFR/qV3ZQ7dPvk0F0J OmUFvlSlRPtRACuf6tm3DzOdvgwlo8yL5xCr/lowlfj372RE3njeNrvaDar8XME6M+fK f+uA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=FBLSOCsxwWKv4kAkTEgBZ/LI5eL8yjJEf+jYjcpMc0w=; b=tnqDo8yybDmKGERqarHKwGjG2KvVN2Y3NsaTfP9bZv8il50WXgWLdXKi960iSGoyUU 9+CA2oa1iZdWXsobPnyr58UKaGEmqps5sRgaDmzVbhky/xnlv9pMrvvTOXy1THphxxZK hS/lOXC5i5YHp7wLSzV/pRaqNx5OkLQL14vdsbXp0XRgAtV0qBcD/x/hG/BEfT+EWEuZ 4ROOSEchwNIfYoOCdrhXtmAGXt8sMe9R+b7VI8YOsdt5LZH1RsL6oSIAnN/ZxT/Xh1tM B+zZUW1iA7Gn41relbIqXj4iwoq1voE61rjqfd/2hQFKCHcVlT6y+rtgHGkFJaSoaARY kwmQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5hbbd0807HYKdrcYRkbfBgWYIZARdE3Icogw4CKp0JMa730UrdP zAb8yoQI+CO5cYTKy/o=
X-Received: by 10.223.163.199 with SMTP id m7mr192359wrb.128.1503398323542; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 03:38:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-giheron-nitro3.cisco.com ([173.38.220.36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 55sm11110533wrv.32.2017.08.22.03.38.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Aug 2017 03:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D8E8D3F56@dggemm512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 11:39:04 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1F38FB23-119A-4E36-8D5F-E43B48DE7110@gmail.com>
References: <05545A83-FEB9-486F-9003-8ADD500D5884@juniper.net> <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D8E8D3F56@dggemm512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
To: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/di3pRmHRRTuFvlTM8JvzioI9N6s>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] WG adoption poll draft-zheng-netconf-udp-pub-channel-00
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 10:38:48 -0000

There seem to be a few issues with this draft:

1) it suggests a 32 bit field for device ID and then suggests generating it from the MAC address.  48 into 32 doesn’t go.   Perhaps an EUI-64 makes more sense?  Or do you even need this given that UDP packets tend to have source IP addresses? Or are you thinking in terms of NAT?  Or of correlating notifications from different line-cards on the same system that may have different source IP addresses?

2) the timestamp has 32 bits each of seconds and microseconds and says those are as per RFC3339.  From my reading of RFC3339 it encodes dates/times as strings.

3) building your own reliability mechanism on top of UDP seems like a strange choice.  Why not just use TCP if you want reliable delivery?  Or re-use existing work on adding reliability to UDP if you see issues with TCP? (in which case explain how reliability based on UDP is better than TCP).

4) big chunks of the draft are left TBD (e.g. selecting encodings, adding authentication/encryption options).    Again there may be work you can reuse there rather than defining your own.

sections 1 - 3 are generally ok - but don’t really say anything we didn’t know already...

Giles

> On 22 Aug 2017, at 02:46, Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes/Support.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Zhenbin(Robin)
> 
> 
> 
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Netconf [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Kent Watsen
> 发送时间: 2017年8月22日 6:04
> 收件人: netconf@ietf.org
> 主题: [Netconf] WG adoption poll draft-zheng-netconf-udp-pub-channel-00
> 
> All,
> 
> This is start of a two-week poll on making the following draft a NETCONF working group document:
> 
>  draft-zheng-netconf-udp-pub-channel-00 [1]
> 
> Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
> 
> 
> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zheng-netconf-udp-pub-channel-00
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> Kent (and Mahesh)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf