Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6241 (3821)

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> Tue, 10 December 2013 12:45 UTC

Return-Path: <lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A3A1AE02F for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 04:45:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.352
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.352 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_CZ=0.445, HOST_EQ_CZ=0.904, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pb_cQC5iP8UF for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 04:45:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [IPv6:2001:1488:800:400::400]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FB61ADF5F for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 04:45:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.29.2.202] (nat-5.bravonet.cz [77.48.224.5]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 047BA13F98D; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:45:14 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1386679515; bh=sEPn/zjpelq12QCd2YEc5rFEfQSNoWy1C8VhJOc0kzI=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=L7xh8S7MwgwL7vG9AxYrCpWmA1LjGfvQkYqIZmRYiQAacN2wYRzLZ5TDx0rwNaF3K p8ms8MpMnDsocUJB5jyzObwEZ0c6jk9gMhBQx2pTwbBZI/cZenCJFlv0qaOML9PkWt 3E8XhMUYqrjpQNYANIZtIBiYoTLBGF3Z0spFvU6I=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
From: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20131210.132819.2303764306420511964.mbj@tail-f.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:45:14 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B209CEBA-E32C-4BAB-90DC-3D54D9BA6F4D@nic.cz>
References: <20131206100737.B33EB7FC383@rfc-editor.org> <52A62972.4010001@bwijnen.net> <20131210.132819.2303764306420511964.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Bj=F6rklund?= <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: rob.enns@gmail.com, joelja@bogus.com, andy.bierman@brocade.com, Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6241 (3821)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:45:22 -0000

On 10 Dec 2013, at 13:28, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>; wrote:

> "Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>; wrote:
>> We have a set of 3 new errata reported to RFC6241.
>> See:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6241&rec_status=15&presentation=table
>> 
>> We would like to hear from the authors/editors what their
>> opinion is on the reported errata.
> 
> I think the proposed text is fine, however I do not know if it
> qualifies as an errata.  IMO it clarifies the description of
> confirmed-commit, but the current text is not wrong.

So perhaps it might qualify as an editorial erratum, rather than technical?

Lada

> 
> 
> /martin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf

--
Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C