Re: [netconf] Trouble with RFC 8040 (Restconf) fields Query Parameter

Douglas Hubler <douglas@hubler.us> Fri, 08 May 2020 13:11 UTC

Return-Path: <douglas@hubler.us>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44163A0AAE for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 06:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hubler-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ov0jDuvtdTlU for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 06:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12d.google.com (mail-il1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEB4E3A0A78 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2020 06:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id n11so1340078ilj.4 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 May 2020 06:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hubler-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=oJEyT2R1nCOV7UUI1TXBPS2YkSLLnhD+NyUIuuIdN6A=; b=wBtezeQMIHnBnUmJH9a/9zdmv9snZROEG1j17bHiZeX/vLSamgyGEYqQtBeYPs33Tg X+izFcYRmheTdXZnVVLuDURR5kbx1XvnPP8EZlFNNYxgdNiW+3hud89uC4JP7aowhldB HsuSSGvBukXR5pLIt9xrXnFMO7V5MxoYxK+HN9aSQ91WvhMzzM2OjMHK7H8WfTozzP6M zLy/fSk57d6lRlziEB0uGLFz/1kU6FJgIcKrMp9DKt2cT5S1B5wYBMciynKjLd03LFm0 Cgz+EAjenNujRxiPJ7twSlAPqFvE64cmpDSzm1WttSd2UuyXF/Awo9VYyoQx07FyFJei WmsQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oJEyT2R1nCOV7UUI1TXBPS2YkSLLnhD+NyUIuuIdN6A=; b=B3Rv8UWXDmD1swmgAw2YBlclJo6kFPqPMj1Hc09/qwr9H4/72TRX2mkkkIBVFNy2x/ D45FQ+yNx8x+LCFBmx90Q2HBQ16bWgWbq9FGHOjk9yQ2vItKWl5goUg+67kHKEqDiUBw d8HaObV8woZrDM2hjolrLo1fh9kuKH37qiPAjs8lNB92yr+MRDF9+vDU4J57lLujN5tt PDUD4iiUJ+0Pr9VxKh1GU77ifgvFAvOUD6dzEAumK07rUaaa33M4labErHvTHxagxk5s eSE1ViBGzZqk14x0/XoVSbtpqJ/4mhxNwdhfIHzHubvdEAK8GzeOC+luqFbfSOQUD7xG CINg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Pub+dIxU5jl9fTbo3sKwdgkPx7Ci7QxxRguREIRUfc4RztO9Ed/d sN6hOj9wNabd49+WuNBVyqtwmHVyWK8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKISI/zsjbHu+Ef2kuNBVIqbjfXbMYazjqOUvksmqqom9GoAafYgtGJhtrF6BdnhhXJfB1rFg==
X-Received: by 2002:a92:bf0b:: with SMTP id z11mr2701698ilh.207.1588943507525; Fri, 08 May 2020 06:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-f179.google.com (mail-il1-f179.google.com. [209.85.166.179]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l13sm683770ioc.11.2020.05.08.06.11.46 for <netconf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 08 May 2020 06:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-f179.google.com with SMTP id w6so1351642ilg.1 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 May 2020 06:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a92:b710:: with SMTP id k16mr2662321ili.270.1588943506432; Fri, 08 May 2020 06:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAGnRvup-pLVYgxAx7PnbJJ1gS-GTkD6t5jGD_Ayhh7ctpPothw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGnRvuq=ESLkeyWsgiqE9sXqFwHGUef3A4QRuW=H8ompVO3C4Q@mail.gmail.com> <20200414.222236.518728457229433184.id@4668.se> <CAGnRvurVJBHbRbwtnLXQFeSrDUFSGKWhL1UUjUDjw5-Gc44ozg@mail.gmail.com> <9C6D0A8A-2BD4-4578-8CB3-6969078CE10A@gmail.com> <CAGnRvupqew3Gqow+U4AwAH7ry1f_91=yiX9N2DikNBpF5raOVQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGnRvupqew3Gqow+U4AwAH7ry1f_91=yiX9N2DikNBpF5raOVQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Douglas Hubler <douglas@hubler.us>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 09:11:35 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CALAkb6em3Qb2-rbhacqsbsmqAaWz83Q0_nyUHW0kOJ375F=91g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALAkb6em3Qb2-rbhacqsbsmqAaWz83Q0_nyUHW0kOJ375F=91g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com>
Cc: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000044eab305a522bdc5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/fIE_wXxx7GFvuDd7-08Xb4a8CiY>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Trouble with RFC 8040 (Restconf) fields Query Parameter
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 13:11:51 -0000

I've been very interested in restconf test cases and glad to see some
activity here.

So is the idea restconf server implementations stand up a server that loads
each config/state one-by-one then a utility will also read in same test
cases, exercise queries and assert the expected results?

I'd definitely like to hear more about how you're using this currently and
if you have a working model.

Thanks for sharing.


On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 6:25 AM Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I finally got the okay to push my testcases to a public repository...
> both the description and the filenames are still a little bit rough
> and could use some work, but this is what I am working with at the
> moment.
>
> https://github.com/fkie/ietf-restconf-testcases
>
> Henning Rogge
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 10:33 PM Mahesh Jethanandani
> <mjethanandani@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Henning,
> >
> > On Apr 20, 2020, at 3:44 AM, Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > are there any set of test-cases the IETF used for interoperability tests?
> >
> >
> > While not IETF blessed, ODL ran into multiple issues with the fields
> query parameter, and documented in this Jira report. Documented in there
> are some of the test cases that might interest you to run. There were other
> test cases run in this and this report also that should be of interest.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> > Mahesh Jethanandani (as contributor)
> > mjethanandani@gmail.com
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list
> netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>