Re: [Netconf] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-netconf-zerotouch-25: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com> Thu, 06 December 2018 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <Suresh@kaloom.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7326126DBF; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 07:08:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kaloom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3cmq0ITlX4A4; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 07:08:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from CAN01-TO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr670093.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.67.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A1F7127598; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 07:08:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kaloom.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=xC8Mg7uu3YCFruwhnpP1OOavAdjKwyd8lDQCfqw5jB0=; b=Z0gXMxUCzlps2ZEdtBW/nr5FgssoUO0/8L3ldEUhTSkAvkhdB9opvj7QchAuOOWf4GFpVh/trwec9TOrUeyIeHUJY2ux8p/rWL+DCj1NHFRxI4LrmX2npFa7q7zU8q3IaZeMkOY9DT2cZ/Q7h9J4Sbqhlr1skvuOEKo7fWSDkHc=
Received: from YTOPR0101MB1819.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (52.132.44.159) by YTOPR0101MB2234.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (52.132.49.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1404.19; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 15:08:30 +0000
Received: from YTOPR0101MB1819.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::5166:4dc:8313:30d0]) by YTOPR0101MB1819.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::5166:4dc:8313:30d0%5]) with mapi id 15.20.1382.023; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 15:08:30 +0000
From: Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com>
To: Ian Farrer <ianfarrer@gmx.com>
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "netconf-chairs@ietf.org" <netconf-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-netconf-zerotouch@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netconf-zerotouch@ietf.org>, Bert Wijnen <bwijnen@bwijnen.net>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-netconf-zerotouch-25: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHUjVgivfENKBoO50ifJIbnEFwFx6Vx0GcA
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 15:08:30 +0000
Message-ID: <731DA7D0-A355-41C5-9331-55DAD09A501E@kaloom.com>
References: <154407548645.31858.6036268091969542377.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <128D9A3F-6ADD-4049-B086-9066C584BFF7@gmx.com>
In-Reply-To: <128D9A3F-6ADD-4049-B086-9066C584BFF7@gmx.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Suresh@kaloom.com;
x-originating-ip: [222.128.199.6]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; YTOPR0101MB2234; 6:vB8Y+Ev4ITpkdfJiU87kY4VS1X/X8fS8fN5WtPE0u78EibahAbqGkmwhG9TEeZtEdPd+ROOzJ/rIpOVoikIPuvZuBuAHeS++Dv+I62Gr6VGB+H5ap7vi3ZT9hyca9WoYvKP36/3pZ9/eORUMKodRBe19SqoL8+k0lkJBxGhXSSriyKfiDN9k4ORYxVR9n/kKJz7kMnreaH1gFk+amsxEZlBt0LsvTZ1wTSxSqgbVhK6xeH8EBDQyAOpcIcgMNp7NeI9Jblw0SYc/04YueHA/TcnDtke2nVoHszFJMSc5sNQEyhWxwZjKRFWSqOYIQJ1WQwCJFKKuRaRU26YDal3vJ6hOHI/XA9j2NWJBFWGLjveMcsoPo5A3GYefgeHgd9ObPZRjwI9ldMH6QVXqobAyT3Dj4mOutZZBGbWOV4g3vU4QWlJZj7oad9KoGU7/yUK6hto3dtyFwSK27I9z06YdJQ==; 5:g1zeEIMLuYRbxlws71Gzb2qngyi188goYC/wwBbW5IS4tJg/pRIN3gq3rGDzwCOX8B3NQ+GODtfr/BHMp9a6wYokI7Zw0Rdj1/YX9gzmz0iYxOZfnHsOVmaOhZ5tEQ/k1Ayk0fd0P91h3btSFfMe4Y321On5S3OFQGSx+Oe6PFI=; 7:fl5DnmvAVXGppo8Lo07SOzSBxinzFT2MkeIP/fv3IsVsn3uAjytpadut+zuj85NxXG4ooAo82ujmtOOo7N2k0jNYlKAEip3WtJJJETtQQt5Snj9B2tt8/rL7snBJPs6601GShMvr+FMF0+AP9wVy6Q==
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 66fac28d-b443-4e1c-d95e-08d65b8caedc
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390098)(7020095)(4652040)(7021145)(8989299)(4534185)(7022145)(4603075)(4627221)(201702281549075)(8990200)(7048125)(7024125)(7027125)(7023125)(5600074)(711020)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:YTOPR0101MB2234;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: YTOPR0101MB2234:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <YTOPR0101MB2234253681B8D08389B52732B4A90@YTOPR0101MB2234.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040522)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(3231455)(999002)(944501520)(52105112)(10201501046)(148016)(149066)(150057)(6041310)(2016111802025)(20161123558120)(20161123564045)(20161123560045)(20161123562045)(6043046)(201708071742011)(7699051)(76991095); SRVR:YTOPR0101MB2234; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:YTOPR0101MB2234;
x-forefront-prvs: 087894CD3C
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(396003)(136003)(366004)(376002)(39840400004)(346002)(199004)(189003)(51914003)(3846002)(26005)(36756003)(53546011)(99286004)(6506007)(33656002)(305945005)(6116002)(256004)(14444005)(8676002)(97736004)(81156014)(81166006)(102836004)(186003)(8936002)(7736002)(6306002)(76176011)(6486002)(66066001)(80792005)(82746002)(25786009)(6436002)(106356001)(6916009)(6512007)(83716004)(2906002)(71200400001)(71190400001)(486006)(5660300001)(11346002)(476003)(446003)(53936002)(105586002)(2616005)(14454004)(86362001)(6246003)(508600001)(68736007)(72206003)(229853002)(316002)(966005)(4326008)(54906003)(518174003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:YTOPR0101MB2234; H:YTOPR0101MB1819.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: kaloom.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: aFuMamRPrX9M/d/7BiMImTctn0e8XyYJQknBiBxwe1MOqFzYUvhmO1YnCQ5QT3o2FmETOM5SlBSF3eIC6cgH354vGnLP64DkbUkk4k1tJUrpyYgz8EehLxy8BDIUgLSrqSBDGe3xGIh6eFnAPCmZKRIh53zodiVnyrDCx8SIHdu+kDxlJSpCBypUfpyJI/+vOYUT0RWPq3BwBn6t5uzGJ6V3mfcb2P0R9AaDqT1axG+PTIv1dz2s1tOzrtngTP7+d6FFkt1TT51kSG8gIIte5MEzmF0aF8CBIGkVRaiecmYQcvNe3UwU6FlAMQC1Tuk2zSFvlGM76d+R3yIkTJfDFAhi9b4grxn/fE7FT+11Up0=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <20822CD7667D634588D2A387690F3803@CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: kaloom.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 66fac28d-b443-4e1c-d95e-08d65b8caedc
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Dec 2018 15:08:30.5980 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 47d58e26-f796-48e8-ac40-1c365c204513
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: YTOPR0101MB2234
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/fIKlInb1UruSI3f8EX8W1yJYS_M>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-netconf-zerotouch-25: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 15:08:39 -0000

Hi Ian,
  Thanks for the quick response. These changes work for me. I will clear as soon as the new rev hits.

Regards
Suresh

> On Dec 6, 2018, at 6:37 AM, ianfarrer@gmx.com wrote:
> 
> Hi Suresh,
> 
> Please see inline below.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ian
> 
>> On 6. Dec 2018, at 06:51, Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-netconf-zerotouch-25: Discuss
>> 
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>> 
>> 
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>> 
>> 
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-zerotouch/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> DISCUSS:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> * Section 8.1
>> 
>> This should be easy to fix but this text about the cardinality of the option
>> 
>> "Servers MUST NOT send more than one instance of the
>> OPTION_V4_ZEROTOUCH_REDIRECT option."
>> 
>> is contradictory to the following recommendation to use RFC3396 for long URLs
>> *which will certainly result* in multiple options being sent. I would like
>> personally like this to be a qualified MUST NOT (e.g. MUST NOT except for the
>> long URL case) but I leave it up to the authors and the sponsoring AD to figure
>> out the best way forward.
>> 
> 
> [if -Suggest that the following paragraph:
> 
> Servers MUST NOT send more than one instance of the
> OPTION_V4_ZEROTOUCH_REDIRECT option. 
> 
> Is replaced with this text:
> 
> ---
> The server’s DHCP message MUST contain only a single instance of the
> OPTION_V4_ZEROTOUCH_REDIRECT’s 'bootstrap-server-list’
> field. However, the list of URIs in this field may exceed the maximum allowed
> length of a single DHCPv4 option (per [RFC3396]).
> 
> If the length of 'bootstrap-server-list’ is small enough to fit into a single instance
> of OPTION_V4_ZEROTOUCH_REDIRECT,  the server MUST NOT send
> more than one instance of this option. 
> 
> If the length of the 'bootstrap-server-list’ field is too large to fit into a single
> option, then OPTION_V4_ZEROTOUCH_REDIRECT MUST be split into
> multiple instances of the option according to the process described in [RFC3396].
> ---
> ]
> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> * Please update the DHCPv6 (RFC3315) references to correspond to RFC8415
>> (Section 18.2 mainly for the client behavior and Section 18.3 for the server
>> behavior) as it has been obsoleted.
> 
> [if - Will update]
> 
>> 
>> * Thanks for using the DHCPv6 option guidelines properly for the option formats
>> and cardinality. Greatly appreciated.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Netconf mailing list
>> Netconf@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>