Re: [Netconf] Solicit comments on inline action capability for NETCONF

Rohit R Ranade <rohitrranade@huawei.com> Wed, 04 July 2018 02:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rohitrranade@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC930130DEB for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 19:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.189
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.189 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yQg2YdH4ephf for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 19:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1740130934 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 19:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 3ABF5539258B4 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 03:51:51 +0100 (IST)
Received: from DGGEML424-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.41) by lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.382.0; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 03:51:51 +0100
Received: from DGGEML510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.6]) by dggeml424-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.199.41]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 10:51:40 +0800
From: Rohit R Ranade <rohitrranade@huawei.com>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, "Zhengguangying (Walker)" <zhengguangying@huawei.com>
CC: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Solicit comments on inline action capability for NETCONF
Thread-Index: AdQTOvQ+DGsUYeJXQ/uaFzBxunpGvAABkhag
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2018 02:51:39 +0000
Message-ID: <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BBC8F99@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AEC24AC@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AEC24AC@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.18.150.121]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BBC8F99dggeml510mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/gR55P9jk94EP3jWS2uR4IM-_gl0>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Solicit comments on inline action capability for NETCONF
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2018 02:51:56 -0000

Hi Wuqin / Walker,

Section 1

"However which
   data node is applied to which configuration datastore is not
   specified under "action".
"
RFC 8342 is clear that "action" is always invoked in the context of <operational> datastore.
Section 6.2:
"Actions are always invoked in the context of the operational state
   datastore.  The node for which the action is invoked MUST exist in
   the operational state datastore.
"

Is there any user scenario where config and action both MUST happen together ? If so, I feel the introduction can elaborate more on such scenario.

With Regards,
Rohit R Ranade

From: Netconf [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Qin Wu
Sent: 04 July 2018 07:32
To: netconf@ietf.org
Subject: [Netconf] Solicit comments on inline action capability for NETCONF

Hi, Folks:
We have posted inline action capability draft on Jun 28:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/current/msg14823.html



One comment we received from the list is:

https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/current/msg14863.html

The v-(01) is uploaded to address this comment.
Therefore we would like to draw you attention again on this draft

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zheng-netconf-inline-action-capability-01
We would like to receive more review and feedback on this draft, thanks.

-Qin