Re: [netconf] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-netconf-subscribed-notifications-23: (with DISCUSS)

"Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com> Mon, 29 April 2019 17:58 UTC

Return-Path: <evoit@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE791200CD; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 10:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AEsUX5BBYt9I; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 10:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 710E4120096; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 10:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3042; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1556560703; x=1557770303; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=mD1jfCSksHUkgO2BThu6Z906TtH9dfe6nboUbKmcRVk=; b=YbrberVSiHaGCx9gmHiDVwdBO14i9GuXliqAynPOsPYrLgGU9GfDO7Tt oZ4/51TUOxFAQgd3ALfpR7/T5uomTAWBBBfKXUlFH9NYAIeq5zDgWN7b3 4q4ShktYIwFTC209ZsYDPQQk9o9tdb4EBzCmyG9fOTEMytpLNMnij3exO c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AEAABAOsdc/5xdJa1mDgwBAQEBAQI?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBBwIBAQEBgVEFAQEBAQsBgWYqgWwoCoQGiByNEphQFIFnDgEBhG0CF4Y?= =?us-ascii?q?bIzQJDgEDAQEEAQECAQJtKIVKAQEBBCMROAoBAgwEAgEIFQIDAiYCAgIwFQg?= =?us-ascii?q?IAgQBDQUIEYI+glSuTIEvijGBCycBi0kXgUA/hCM+hAmDRYJYBIsBgjeZPwk?= =?us-ascii?q?CggmOaoEdgiQjgg2TGowNgR6PJoQJAhEVgTAfOIFWcBWDJ4IbFxRtAQmMWTt?= =?us-ascii?q?BMZMfgSEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,410,1549929600"; d="scan'208";a="264444237"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 29 Apr 2019 17:58:21 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x3THwKQo018465 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 29 Apr 2019 17:58:21 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 13:58:20 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.003; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 13:58:20 -0400
From: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-netconf-subscribed-notifications@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netconf-subscribed-notifications@ietf.org>, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>, "netconf-chairs@ietf.org" <netconf-chairs@ietf.org>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-netconf-subscribed-notifications-23: (with DISCUSS)
Thread-Index: AQHU/rKoAXBzztdqKUKWeXbDQMBk+KZTatEw
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 17:58:19 +0000
Message-ID: <717530026d2d4af0a92c318ecbdbb4bd@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
References: <155655963180.15870.3650019434718355043.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <155655963180.15870.3650019434718355043.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.118.56.233]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.153, xch-rtp-013.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/gStjBjmfty7qfpUWdljziUOL0JM>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-netconf-subscribed-notifications-23: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 17:58:25 -0000

Hi Benjamin,

I think you are asking why the following boilerplate text wasn't included...

   This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF
   Contributions published or made publicly available before November
   10, 2008.  The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this
   material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow
   modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process.
   Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling
   the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified
   outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may
   not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format
   it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other
   than English.

This was likely an oversight during the initial author's submission.  If this text was included and uploaded as a -24 update, would that cover your concern?

BTW: the same boilerplate update should also be made to 
draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-event-notification  and draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif

Thanks,
Eric


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>;
> Subject: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-netconf-subscribed-
> notifications-23: (with DISCUSS)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> [putting this out early in the hopes it can be resolved quickly; I'm just starting to
> review the document.]
> 
> This document started life as a rfc5277bis, published in July 2008, before RFC
> 5378 (BCP 78) was published in November of 2008.  If we are using any text from
> RFC 5277 and did not gain the additional rights declaration from the authors of
> that document, this document needs to use a different boilerplate text (the "pre-
> 2008" text).  I look at the sibling document draft-ietf-netfonf-yang-push of this
> document, which does use the pre-2008 boilerplate, and am having a hard time
> understanding why this document does not also have the pre-2008 boilerplate.
> 
> 
>