[netconf] [Errata Verified] RFC7589 (8193)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sat, 04 January 2025 06:47 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (unknown [167.172.21.234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7330EC14F617; Fri, 3 Jan 2025 22:47:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 461) id CBB1F1D63C1; Fri, 3 Jan 2025 22:47:15 -0800 (PST)
To: logithack@mailbox.org, mohamad.badra@zu.ac.ae, luchuk@snmp.com, j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20250104064715.CBB1F1D63C1@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 22:47:15 -0800
Message-ID-Hash: EFOVIYEREFMBEF74HJTJLAOUG3UJVGMC
X-Message-ID-Hash: EFOVIYEREFMBEF74HJTJLAOUG3UJVGMC
X-MailFrom: wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-netconf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: iesg@ietf.org, netconf@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [netconf] [Errata Verified] RFC7589 (8193)
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/h8HhmxEm0-coVLovq6OertvPsCI>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:netconf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:netconf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:netconf-leave@ietf.org>
The following errata report has been verified for RFC7589, "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Transport Layer Security (TLS) with Mutual X.509 Authentication". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8193 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Ryan <logithack@mailbox.org> Date Reported: 2024-12-01 Verified by: Mahesh Jethanandani (IESG) Section: 2 Original Text ------------- The well-known TCP port number 6513 is used by NETCONF servers to listen for TCP connections established by NETCONF over TLS clients. Corrected Text -------------- The registered TCP port number 6513 is used by NETCONF servers to listen for TCP connections established by NETCONF over TLS clients. Notes ----- Section 10 of that same RFC correctly states: "Per RFC 5539, IANA assigned TCP port number (6513) in the 'Registered Port Numbers' range with the service name 'netconf-tls'. This port is the default port for NETCONF over TLS, as defined in Section 2." With that said, wouldn't the sentence concerned be more correct in the suggested form? Thanks! -------------------------------------- RFC7589 (draft-ietf-netconf-rfc5539bis-10) -------------------------------------- Title : Using the NETCONF Protocol over Transport Layer Security (TLS) with Mutual X.509 Authentication Publication Date : June 2015 Author(s) : M. Badra, A. Luchuk, J. Schoenwaelder Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Network Configuration Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [netconf] [Errata Verified] RFC7589 (8193) RFC Errata System