Re: [netconf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-07.txt

Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com> Wed, 03 February 2021 12:21 UTC

Return-Path: <hrogge@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 389A83A0A27 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 04:21:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3aClOtwUrn8R for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 04:21:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12e.google.com (mail-lf1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48F273A0A02 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 04:21:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id h7so33009242lfc.6 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 04:21:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=C3pJOEp0xeB9FRT/IVPmOiaY8W9zqfOdmOe7xgaNoN8=; b=OFs9TSYi4MZWzyD/BCMxrsu7A8xm5sdVpaCfylbW+IWrBKp932oiDnOXS1Od3WXkfV LSs5mTxqUBwAYpRAm7M/Wc6REAyQvgzaJs/0/CPbGStelk7Dqebct8/HVNYt28Oy0gJm nSgJD7WmTkCsYTfvaWJCzIUN6QHdAl/3MBCI1KIgvTQE3AfY7pyRxsmwHLY/avqc3HQt XRb+MMT6zydrbOTqedqQ+hw5Fq5S7wuo3jqEsJbZRPwoK81Oq7926QVQLEB9WimZ1e7n JFrIsfmZjTg/dj7DuzbdIrkLw6RPWIPPsTRTxGsQqwRQuz04TGHsmehfm2228xWU3WAZ G2Ew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=C3pJOEp0xeB9FRT/IVPmOiaY8W9zqfOdmOe7xgaNoN8=; b=oCYXL6lrstGjPpicZwdLvCxG59lFIqddEEkoRRYNgamzp57ZAxKV15q/3EoCzsZysP 6Po6LV9iQ+K5Sck3+GQicX59Bel4C1daJ5I7uxVGXJK+y/xXg9uz7XVS4SXNoDT2VqIJ v4OelPLDs1HIeI2+xRv+RJ8WuH9QOb3xfl82PWklaRIYFDQdBIWSXQRp4l3hxJjGH7l3 ya/KP92FcoIM/bF1lASY+wYITwJBsHq5wa3hqOwmXNr0XyAgrnr4fKrSkthwAvK0tRa8 5HYPJ2WSlRDuM2RgAKQvyaUN9TUjUEeA5EuwN61aZd9m8NRX+N8NTONbcORdrb5w2U8K Zrwg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533UxzVVnGoRa+YsA7SwofDKLMgPT+cmWb/vtys7uhfiK0SUP5We GtI4ocar3/n1hp+qTeg81+lY2ET4eKLQawxxBlxYkmYNvXk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwyWlGX4Yj3NIJx7JOqRHmexC1Jfb+H8KK5f7cUtILMSfwunPTYpLcSb2PXDTTTeux0kv9SGGBoc0FQqA+UOsc=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:43b0:: with SMTP id t16mr1562897lfl.582.1612354858170; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 04:20:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161230456345.20070.17776740163539556284@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <161230456345.20070.17776740163539556284@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 13:20:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGnRvur_bt-yfDi+aJLWzyGwexA7mYwdURgY7zF2SuzmC7UTug@mail.gmail.com>
To: Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/hM2UU2hSw7CTTzQ6026S61VCAqw>
Subject: Re: [netconf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-07.txt
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 12:21:02 -0000

Re-sending the POST request for every pipelined notification resolves
the issues I had with the pipelining.

Also the compacted example illustration is easier to understand in my opinion.

Henning Rogge