Re: [netconf] Pointers to major "crypto" threads?

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 08 August 2019 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3685120147 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 09:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z1dwfPQa8KS4 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 09:46:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 134AB120125 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 09:46:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050102.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id x78GbiBI021264; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 17:45:58 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=QeRD2f8m4HSIeSSryUTl/qLtwRPkZ1IgoDt5KkICjHw=; b=XiA4detsu8lVWlBBNr7INVdPLlxIBIrQHgSEXpRbIQZ7qvY+OMFFQLSR6Jh6AxMQTgvE Cohs5p5JatDzdNSqUZPx9O95KT8KpNqlXcktpCfv+ybXGwJzT9Pg3e34ajDfi6TTtexK 7pJ8kyQBk6IOdRcYqW8nnUuXlYlKKFWRkt8RxzMhHLYYCT6ztInmtO73wfRIwcIr318p FBFNidD0J7SsEkhTaaycxo3dWAySt7f2f4cYB8MHqrrG90PN6Y6A3JbL7aVhWnE9Ebgf GT2HihrDEK/a2qo+y9rlt5qOf25dBh7bfpn4yCfGHl9BtjToByRJy6yj/o5ecfez+2WA 3g==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19] (may be forged)) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2u4ybe7r29-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 08 Aug 2019 17:45:58 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x78GX8Xg026098; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 12:45:57 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.30]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2u55kwhu0t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 08 Aug 2019 12:45:57 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) by usma1ex-dag3mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 12:45:57 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 12:45:56 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 12:45:56 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
CC: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netconf] Pointers to major "crypto" threads?
Thread-Index: AQHVTd+GClyYowveV0SIeQ8kbqJVDKbxpGEA///RXoA=
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 16:45:56 +0000
Message-ID: <3BE70E76-AB66-4BF6-8FFD-A65F7294AD01@akamai.com>
References: <EB4BBC2F-161C-4AED-9C01-BFBB75C0D923@akamai.com> <0100016c71dc7c15-fd7a35b0-1414-497e-8ecc-aa59e239c628-000000@email.amazonses.com>
In-Reply-To: <0100016c71dc7c15-fd7a35b0-1414-497e-8ecc-aa59e239c628-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1c.0.190804
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.34.106]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_3BE70E76AB664BF68FFDA65F7294AD01akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-08-08_06:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=881 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1908080153
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:5.22.84,1.0.8 definitions=2019-08-08_07:2019-08-07,2019-08-08 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=881 clxscore=1011 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1906280000 definitions=main-1908080153
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/ir6dk3DND5i-zdlKYdNh83hVYV8>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Pointers to major "crypto" threads?
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 16:46:02 -0000

  *   What do you mean by "the crypto objects" drafts?   Do you mean https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-crypto-types<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dietf-2Dnetconf-2Dcrypto-2Dtypes&d=DwMFAg&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=4LM0GbR0h9Fvx86FtsKI-w&m=QFOViMLDVSb49MVw97CWLsVelHJK_qz9djjspxWiOas&s=cGrVdIk5zF-nsbElnDx6MD5ObESqPnEhhEOF6xkX8Q4&e=>?

Yes, that one.


  *   As an update to that, the Sec DIr discussed with Roman, who discussed with IESG in Montreal.  Nothing significant seemed to come out of it though.  l just pinged the Sec Dir for an update.

I brought this up at the secdir lunch during Montreal, and it was not well-received.

I am looking for email discussion (I guess I can watch meetecho archives if that’s useful) to understand the WG thoughts.