Re: [netconf] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif-13: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Tue, 14 May 2019 08:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D721200FA; Tue, 14 May 2019 01:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k3e8KPxQ2YDw; Tue, 14 May 2019 01:41:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8223::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 802191200CE; Tue, 14 May 2019 01:41:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 200116b82cebde00487f6fba2997f96c.dip.versatel-1u1.de ([2001:16b8:2ceb:de00:487f:6fba:2997:f96c]); authenticated by wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1hQSzu-0005T3-MH; Tue, 14 May 2019 10:41:18 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\))
From: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <6AA3C49F-28F9-43A3-9712-CF3CB26102EA@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 10:41:18 +0200
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif@ietf.org>, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>, "netconf-chairs@ietf.org" <netconf-chairs@ietf.org>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7E5187F0-B326-40BB-8966-F182A8D8B738@kuehlewind.net>
References: <155776336478.23641.7579515397254467186.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6AA3C49F-28F9-43A3-9712-CF3CB26102EA@cisco.com>
To: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ietf@kuehlewind.net;1557823291;7e015073;
X-HE-SMSGID: 1hQSzu-0005T3-MH
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/j5YARAIU2PC4ENSm0GiUOMlNUXY>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 08:41:35 -0000

Hi Reshad,

Okay. Thanks for the info!

Mirja


> On 13. May 2019, at 19:57, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) <rrahman@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thank you for your review. Please see inline.
> 
> 
> On 2019-05-13, 12:03 PM, "Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker" <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
>    Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
>    draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif-13: No Objection
> 
>    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>    introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
>    Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
>    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif/
> 
> 
> 
>    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>    COMMENT:
>    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>    One question (and this is probably just because of my lack of detailed
>    knowledge about RESTCONF):
> 
>    Sec 4 says: "To meet subscription quality of service promises, the publisher
>    MUST
>       take any existing subscription "dscp" and apply it to the DSCP
>       marking in the IP header."
>    What does "existing subscription "dscp"" mean here?
> This is referring to the "dscp" leaf node in draft-ietf-netconf-subscribed-notifications. But as Benjamin pointed out, we will be removing this section from this draft since the text got added to subscribed-notifications.
> 
> 
>    Related update: please also consider the comment from the TSV-ART review about
>    the example DSCP value (Thanks Wes!). I actually would also appreciate to add a
>    comment that this is an internal value that depends on the network
>    configuration (in order to avoid that people just randomly copy this example
>    value and suddenly always use 10)!
> Noted.
> 
> Regards,
> Reshad.  
> 
> 
>