IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netconf] ietf crypto types - permanently hidden

Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Mon, 29 April 2019 17:28 UTC

Return-Path: <0100016a6a24006f-6e5cc3ba-ecd3-4190-8432-f8e91bb0c3ae-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 141CB1203D0 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 10:28:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NHUHHlOrIykv for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 10:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a8-83.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a8-83.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.8.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDC05120025 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 10:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=6gbrjpgwjskckoa6a5zn6fwqkn67xbtw; d=amazonses.com; t=1556558905; h=From:Message-Id:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:Feedback-ID; bh=/MaYVlVK1qi5S6CjTyjlNUZn1s2Zk4b1REsq331gMMM=; b=WPCEuUpyPu2NpG9vfRqLU0kBJato+cj2GmB0KFs1sxHOGDtk1h8/68ZhJlgYYBAb 35RDCtJnZvP6gBofluqc7ZCliWrkb64GKmhxpptdgg5XeEPX/O04fkYtL/vDYIrn3Tz Lla2HuFg7PQMK2ipIyk/2XojI6cMDFZ5MjFy59jk=
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Message-ID: <0100016a6a24006f-6e5cc3ba-ecd3-4190-8432-f8e91bb0c3ae-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_66567D0E-865A-4C70-A35C-9B8960610EBB"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 17:28:25 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20190429170555.fxggfy7555mklihh@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Cc: Balázs Kovács <balazs.kovacs@ericsson.com>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
References: <20190404.194623.1178346313710501110.mbj@tail-f.com> <01dd01d4eb9c$b9a04160$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <20190405.142201.707949273328784535.mbj@tail-f.com> <413d5725-9c27-e50b-2622-1b0e2f35cdb1@ericsson.com> <VI1PR07MB4735949BE61335ACC8A975E7833C0@VI1PR07MB4735.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <0100016a5019d7f9-7f737c63-d07c-4c7f-b12e-c5b19d50eeaf-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20190424180513.gtxmreicd7iydrpr@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <0100016a510a3038-7671e146-e23f-4bc9-9f93-ea2314b5d4e7-000000@email.amazonses.com> <VI1PR07MB4735FEEE1303E361B3B44FA983390@VI1PR07MB4735.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <0100016a69e36565-37279712-e5de-4c48-9a8a-7397d54c11b3-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20190429170555.fxggfy7555mklihh@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
X-SES-Outgoing: 2019.04.29-54.240.8.83
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/k3-hh3JDy_z6wBcXKfAoJuVsVgo>
Subject: Re: [netconf] ietf crypto types - permanently hidden
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 17:28:28 -0000

> Is it sufficiently clear what 'is denied' means, i.e., how a server
> has to report the failure of the action?

Shall we use the 'data-exists' error-tag?


> PS: s/invokaions/invocations/

Fixed.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email