Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8525 (6484)

Jan Lindblad <janl@tail-f.com> Mon, 15 March 2021 10:00 UTC

Return-Path: <janl@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B1C3A0884 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 03:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U3iScOX7j5We for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 03:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEEE93A0858 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 03:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.117] (213-67-237-150-no99.tbcn.telia.com [213.67.237.150]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 147161AE0D72; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 11:00:51 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Jan Lindblad <janl@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB4366C5416AE4DB8CCF3FE7C3B56C9@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 11:00:50 +0100
Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Martin_Bj=C3=B6rklund?= <mbj+ietf@4668.se>, "rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>, "warren@kumari.net" <warren@kumari.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <608B4604-1970-4BE3-85E5-565985A4EBF6@tail-f.com>
References: <20210315090402.3F34FF4076A@rfc-editor.org> <20210315.102411.704461003596497032.id@4668.se> <MN2PR11MB4366C5416AE4DB8CCF3FE7C3B56C9@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/k3bcFy3Vy0XBz1ov_rgjymtUkbA>
Subject: Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8525 (6484)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 10:00:58 -0000

Rob, Martin,

Wouldn't changing the revision date be a massively non-backwards-compatible change?
Anyone might be importing this module by revision, and tools could be hardcoded towards the revision date, given that this is a pretty fundamental module.

What is the (technical) benefit of changing the date?

Best Regards,
/jan


> Hi Martin,
> 
> I agree, hold for doc update seems appropriate.
> 
> Any other comments?
> 
> Regards,
> Rob
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Martin Björklund <mbj+ietf@4668.se>
>> Sent: 15 March 2021 09:24
>> To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
>> Cc: andy@yumaworks.com; mbj+ietf@4668.se; j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-
>> university.de; kent+ietf@watsen.net; Rob Wilton (rwilton)
>> <rwilton@cisco.com>om>; warren@kumari.net; mjethanandani@gmail.com;
>> netconf@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8525 (6484)
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Wow, this is obviously a bug.
>> 
>> I am not sure it can be fixed with an errata however.  Perhaps "hold
>> for document update"?
>> 
>> 
>> /martin
>> 
>> 
>> RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8525,
>>> "YANG Library".
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> You may review the report below and at:
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6484
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Type: Technical
>>> Reported by: Jernej Tuljak <jernej.tuljak@mg-soft.si>
>>> 
>>> Section: 4
>>> 
>>> Original Text
>>> -------------
>>>     revision 2016-04-09 {
>>>       description
>>>         "Initial revision.";
>>>       reference
>>>         "RFC 7895: YANG Module Library";
>>>     }
>>> 
>>> Corrected Text
>>> --------------
>>>     revision 2016-06-21 {
>>>       description
>>>         "Initial revision.";
>>>       reference
>>>         "RFC 7895: YANG Module Library";
>>>     }
>>> 
>>> Notes
>>> -----
>>> Initial revision of ietf-yang-library YANG module was 2016-06-21, not
>> 2016-04-09.
>>> 
>>> Instructions:
>>> -------------
>>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
>>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> RFC8525 (draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-07)
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Title               : YANG Library
>>> Publication Date    : March 2019
>>> Author(s)           : A. Bierman, M. Bjorklund, J. Schoenwaelder, K.
>> Watsen, R. Wilton
>>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>>> Source              : Network Configuration
>>> Area                : Operations and Management
>>> Stream              : IETF
>>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> netconf mailing list
>>> netconf@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list
> netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>