Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8525 (6484)

Rob, Martin,

Wouldn't changing the revision date be a massively non-backwards-compatible change?
Anyone might be importing this module by revision, and tools could be hardcoded towards the revision date, given that this is a pretty fundamental module.

What is the (technical) benefit of changing the date?

Best Regards,
/jan

> Hi Martin,
> 
> I agree, hold for doc update seems appropriate.
> 
> Any other comments?
> 
> Regards,
> Rob
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Martin Björklund <mbj+ietf@4668.se>
>> Sent: 15 March 2021 09:24
>> To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
>> Cc: andy@yumaworks.com; mbj+ietf@4668.se; j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-
>> university.de; kent+ietf@watsen.net; Rob Wilton (rwilton)
>> <rwilton@cisco.com>; warren@kumari.net; mjethanandani@gmail.com;
>> netconf@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8525 (6484)
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Wow, this is obviously a bug.
>> 
>> I am not sure it can be fixed with an errata however.  Perhaps "hold
>> for document update"?
>> 
>> 
>> /martin
>> 
>> 
>> RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8525,
>>> "YANG Library".
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> You may review the report below and at:
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6484
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Type: Technical
>>> Reported by: Jernej Tuljak <jernej.tuljak@mg-soft.si>
>>> 
>>> Section: 4
>>> 
>>> Original Text
>>> -------------
>>>     revision 2016-04-09 {
>>>       description
>>>         "Initial revision.";
>>>       reference
>>>         "RFC 7895: YANG Module Library";
>>>     }
>>> 
>>> Corrected Text
>>> --------------
>>>     revision 2016-06-21 {
>>>       description
>>>         "Initial revision.";
>>>       reference
>>>         "RFC 7895: YANG Module Library";
>>>     }
>>> 
>>> Notes
>>> -----
>>> Initial revision of ietf-yang-library YANG module was 2016-06-21, not
>> 2016-04-09.
>>> 
>>> Instructions:
>>> -------------
>>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
>>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> RFC8525 (draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-07)
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Title               : YANG Library
>>> Publication Date    : March 2019
>>> Author(s)           : A. Bierman, M. Bjorklund, J. Schoenwaelder, K.
>> Watsen, R. Wilton
>>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>>> Source              : Network Configuration
>>> Area                : Operations and Management
>>> Stream              : IETF
>>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> netconf mailing list
>>> netconf@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list
> netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
> 