[netconf] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netconf-udp-client-server-04.txt

Alex Huang Feng <alex.huang-feng@insa-lyon.fr> Fri, 04 October 2024 13:52 UTC

Return-Path: <alex.huang-feng@insa-lyon.fr>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86457C14CF0C for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 06:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.263
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.263 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH=2.368, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=insa-lyon.fr
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kMr9_DfVrwfM for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 06:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpout02-ext4.partage.renater.fr (smtpout02-ext4.partage.renater.fr [194.254.241.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B295CC15152E for <netconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 06:52:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmtaauth02.partage.renater.fr (zmtaauth02.partage.renater.fr [194.254.241.25]) by smtpout20.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF45C0066; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 15:52:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from zmtaauth02.partage.renater.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmtaauth02.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6041A04B5; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 15:52:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmtaauth02.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1528A0551; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 15:52:47 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zmtaauth02.partage.renater.fr C1528A0551
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=insa-lyon.fr; s=CB289C06-95B8-49FE-9C4B-D197C6D2E7CB; t=1728049967; bh=5tJsB/6bvoIoyy23EnEMeAo35cP2gO9/GvJwoQuHd+4=; h=Mime-Version:From:Date:Message-Id:To; b=Js0neRlHw1f+tjx7+Q5pedJVgbdeMZAWVVcgGbNKN12wxwNHSbg7EpfmOLZZS5K90 a9h5lWUAzNI/7Erenos7Uv9YkT6d/lOE2R6vGJQULfKJ2D0UGuQHRtPGGFrbQTJU6W 8kpilgkQ6p4HFJlUxve3AH/B1YJgi2a5XBvrG5ge49zZ4HUnPqN1OKuaplDdM5ebTb 5cAoeOx1o5NBz/mWb9SStwTYYBu9ctyhWTP+SKIx3/lYzBDXkAD4nx5pZEN+DEph7Q h3sLn+RBgT/jAKUUjLZg7t/pEUScgnu0g9BcmKC9VqiYL9Iflj/BPotvSHjCsD1IJY 8zx7f8iZnPdeg==
Received: from zmtaauth02.partage.renater.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmtaauth02.partage.renater.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10026) with ESMTP id z-Bz8G3ztL6t; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 15:52:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from 176.146.148.215 (unknown [194.254.241.249]) by zmtaauth02.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8ADBEA04B5; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 15:52:47 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3776.700.51.11.1\))
From: Alex Huang Feng <alex.huang-feng@insa-lyon.fr>
In-Reply-To: <172804948425.100084.1485968544504943811@dt-datatracker-cb674fff7-jr9km>
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2024 15:52:36 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6C73CA66-BF3A-4EED-BE26-590EE7349877@insa-lyon.fr>
References: <172804948425.100084.1485968544504943811@dt-datatracker-cb674fff7-jr9km>
To: Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3776.700.51.11.1)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at clamav02
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Renater-Ptge-SpamState: clean
X-Renater-Ptge-SpamScore: -100
X-Renater-Ptge-SpamCause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrvddvfedgieelucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecutffgpfetvffgtfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurheptggguffhjgffvefgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhgvgicujfhurghnghcuhfgvnhhguceorghlvgigrdhhuhgrnhhgqdhfvghnghesihhnshgrqdhlhihonhdrfhhrqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekgfffhfehhfffkeeiteettdekfeejteefjeeiieefgfehffefieeiiefhhffgteenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecukfhppeduleegrddvheegrddvgedurddvgeelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepudelgedrvdehgedrvdeguddrvdegledphhgvlhhopedujeeirddugeeirddugeekrddvudehpdhmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlvgigrdhhuhgrnhhgqdhfvghnghesihhnshgrqdhlhihonhdrfhhrpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeefpdhrtghpthhtohepnhgvthgtohhnfhesihgvthhfrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepkhgvnhhtodhivghtfhesfigrthhsvghnrdhnvghtpdhrtghpthhtohepphhivghrrhgvrdhfrhgrnhgtohhishesihhnshgrqdhlhihonhdrfhhr
Message-ID-Hash: 7JKRVHPWQLRYJ4KXLBG7XXDICNZ6XCPC
X-Message-ID-Hash: 7JKRVHPWQLRYJ4KXLBG7XXDICNZ6XCPC
X-MailFrom: alex.huang-feng@insa-lyon.fr
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-netconf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Pierre Francois <pierre.francois@insa-lyon.fr>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc5
Precedence: list
Subject: [netconf] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netconf-udp-client-server-04.txt
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/k5PPiYHbsRGb0uiRrOHokEyUslk>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:netconf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:netconf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:netconf-leave@ietf.org>

Dear NETCONF,

I just submitted a new iteration of the udp-client-server draft.

This iteration addresses all the comments from the last thread regarding the default statement on the port nodes.

Thanks @Kent for adding me on the AUTH48 discussion of tcp-client-server. I mimicked those changes on udp-client-server draft.

For the WG, the conclusion is now the following (these changes have been applied to both udp-client-server and tcp-client-server drafts):

On the client:
- The remote-port does not have any default statement anymore. 
	We have added text to state that consumers of this grouping SHOULD refine this node with a default or mandatory statement.
- The local-port does have a default port “0”.
	When this default is not refined by the consumer, it means that the OS picks an arbitrary port number.

On the server:
- The local-port does not have any default statement anymore.
	Follows the same logic as the client, consumers SHOULD refine this node with a default or mandatory statement.

All the issues are addressed. I will let the WG read the draft, but I think it is ready for LC.

Regards,
Alex


> On 4 Oct 2024, at 15:44, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netconf-udp-client-server-04.txt is now available.
> It is a work item of the Network Configuration (NETCONF) WG of the IETF.
> 
>   Title:   YANG Groupings for UDP Clients and UDP Servers
>   Authors: Alex Huang Feng
>            Pierre Francois
>            Kent Watsen
>   Name:    draft-ietf-netconf-udp-client-server-04.txt
>   Pages:   13
>   Dates:   2024-10-04
> 
> Abstract:
> 
>   This document defines two YANG 1.1 modules to support the
>   configuration of UDP clients and UDP servers.
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-udp-client-server/
> 
> There is also an HTMLized version available at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-udp-client-server-04
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-netconf-udp-client-server-04
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list -- netconf@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to netconf-leave@ietf.org