Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040 (6363)

Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Tue, 22 December 2020 16:57 UTC

Return-Path: <010001768b621522-b52104a2-019e-45b2-96b8-bbe29caefb05-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4703A1184 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 08:57:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.894
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QcKudbBYJ7XY for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 08:57:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from a8-96.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a8-96.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.8.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05CE03A1180 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 08:57:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=224i4yxa5dv7c2xz3womw6peuasteono; d=amazonses.com; t=1608656229; h=From:Message-Id:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:Feedback-ID; bh=eVC5LwCtuGo63apd2dJOvUHU8jkFQrzheFhid+WJ3RM=; b=YKbAzPbpUmJeQaPXalBdxSPIXSPZ1+J0ddWBL8vjbGOwqDAs7qUsDtKvls27fWSi J2d0TExgQodSp6zphN8sjJDO90CizbCC2moPznT5RB5dPnfG2sNTAUHp803U91wjdZc w/fKUmdn7/zgw3vVZqTb9mgFT2cTKJr9L6fnXjWI=
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Message-ID: <010001768b621522-b52104a2-019e-45b2-96b8-bbe29caefb05-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_12E2DDD9-5D32-45D0-824D-605667E19D6A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 16:57:09 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CABCOCHR3qG0N6FYzUT9rSFy8T9rZhcXdHobCov8Lb_yKZmL4eQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, muly_i@rad.com, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
References: <20201222143949.F33E8F40744@rfc-editor.org> <CABCOCHR3qG0N6FYzUT9rSFy8T9rZhcXdHobCov8Lb_yKZmL4eQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-SES-Outgoing: 2020.12.22-54.240.8.96
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/l_cNNZLqE8ZGn6PyDg8O7fJaIUk>
Subject: Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040 (6363)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 16:57:13 -0000

+1


> On Dec 22, 2020, at 10:06 AM, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This errata should be rejected.
> The proposed text changes the semantics of the paragraph.
> The original word "will" is not ambiguous or used in error.
> 
> 
> Andy
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 6:40 AM RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org <mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>> wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8040,
> "RESTCONF Protocol".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6363 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6363>
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Muly Ilan <muly_i@rad.com <mailto:muly_i@rad.com>>
> 
> Section: 4.8.2.
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>    By default, the server will include all sub-resources within a
>    retrieved resource that have the same resource type as the requested
>    resource.  The exception is the datastore resource.  If this resource
>    type is retrieved, then by default the datastore and all child data
>    resources are returned.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    By default, the server SHOULD include all sub-resources within a
>    retrieved resource that have the same resource type as the requested
>    resource.  The exception is the datastore resource.  If this resource
>    type is retrieved, then by default the datastore and all child data
>    resources are returned.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Substitute "will" by "SHOULD".
> 
> Use one of the keywords of RFC2119 to clarify the expected server behavior.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8040 (draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-18)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : RESTCONF Protocol
> Publication Date    : January 2017
> Author(s)           : A. Bierman, M. Bjorklund, K. Watsen
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Network Configuration
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG