[netconf] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-subscribed-notifications-23
Carlos Pignataro via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sat, 06 April 2019 02:57 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E76012066A; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 19:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Carlos Pignataro via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: ops-dir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-netconf-subscribed-notifications.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, netconf@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.94.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Carlos Pignataro <cpignata@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <155451947938.10151.12663725914439778891@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 19:57:59 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/lcFIRECbIM7fVCTpNV_pvqcgV4Y>
Subject: [netconf] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-subscribed-notifications-23
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 02:58:00 -0000
Reviewer: Carlos Pignataro Review result: Has Nits Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Summary: Almost Ready This is a comprehensive very well written document. >From an operational point of view, as per the ops-dir review, I have no concerns or comments. Might be nice to collect some of the operational points in an Operations Consideration section, particularly given the document structure of Section 5.x, "ZZZ Considerations". I do have one important question for consideration, which is: what is *really* the relationship of this (+ draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-event-notifications potentially) with RFC 5277? A Normative reference, this doc has no metadata regarding Updating, Obsoleting, etc. Yet lots of it is indeed a superset of it. I recommend the authors+ADs consider whether there is any more formal relationship with RFC 5277 that would require meta-tagging the RFC. Thanks, Carlos Pignataro.
- [netconf] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-n… Carlos Pignataro via Datatracker
- Re: [netconf] Opsdir last call review of draft-ie… Eric Voit (evoit)
- Re: [netconf] Opsdir last call review of draft-ie… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [netconf] Opsdir last call review of draft-ie… Eric Voit (evoit)
- Re: [netconf] Opsdir last call review of draft-ie… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [netconf] Opsdir last call review of draft-ie… Warren Kumari