IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] WG adoption poll draft-zheng-netconf-udp-pub-channel-00

Alexander Clemm <alexander.clemm@huawei.com> Tue, 22 August 2017 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <alexander.clemm@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D53A132A0D for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 10:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EBlVE4Yz210z for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 10:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48021132A06 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 10:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DND07506; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 17:46:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.38) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 18:46:16 +0100
Received: from SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.191]) by SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.148]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 10:46:11 -0700
From: Alexander Clemm <alexander.clemm@huawei.com>
To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
CC: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] WG adoption poll draft-zheng-netconf-udp-pub-channel-00
Thread-Index: AQHTGslpu+5gO8PnQEm3VBneSJzb9qKQ+6EA//+qXCA=
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 17:46:10 +0000
Message-ID: <644DA50AFA8C314EA9BDDAC83BD38A2E0E0F7515@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com>
References: <05545A83-FEB9-486F-9003-8ADD500D5884@juniper.net> <CABCOCHT2uqkudxX1orts0+uYaT+cEv1LFnik6_3MN4w45Pc8SA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABCOCHT2uqkudxX1orts0+uYaT+cEv1LFnik6_3MN4w45Pc8SA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.212.246.23]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_644DA50AFA8C314EA9BDDAC83BD38A2E0E0F7515SJCEML701CHMchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020206.599C6DEA.0001, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.3.191, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: ad0e13863e367fc0d2678f4196c78c89
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/m7vxGuz7I4Qg_H538slPCTtxF_8>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] WG adoption poll draft-zheng-netconf-udp-pub-channel-00
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 17:46:22 -0000

This provides a transport to be used in conjunction with pub/sub.  This is certainly how it is intended to be used- the use case is definitely for ops –  and why IMHO netconf would be a good home and my preference.  Transport might be a possibility as well but seems more general.
--- Alex

From: Netconf [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andy Bierman
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 8:47 AM
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>; Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Cc: netconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Netconf] WG adoption poll draft-zheng-netconf-udp-pub-channel-00

Hi,

Is the NETCONF WG the proper venue to work on UDP?
Seems like the transport area would be a more appropriate home.

Why is this transport work specific to pub/sub?
It seems useful for unconstrained devices on constrained networks
to be able to use UDP instead of TCP for all management messages.


Andy

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net<mailto:kwatsen@juniper.net>> wrote:
All,

This is start of a two-week poll on making the following draft a
NETCONF working group document:

  draft-zheng-netconf-udp-pub-channel-00 [1]

Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
support".  If indicating no, please state your reservations with the
document.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like
to see addressed once the document is a WG document.


[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zheng-netconf-udp-pub-channel-00


Thank you,
Kent (and Mahesh)




_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org<mailto:Netconf@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email