Re: [netconf] Adoption call for notif-yang-04
Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Mon, 22 April 2024 17:59 UTC
Return-Path: <0100018f06f6dd43-4f1e99fc-2479-497c-862e-f41674426131-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0203DC17C8A5 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 10:59:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tANrAmWQ9v8x for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 10:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a48-110.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a48-110.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.48.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EED68C16943A for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 10:59:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=ug7nbtf4gccmlpwj322ax3p6ow6yfsug; d=amazonses.com; t=1713808793; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:Feedback-ID; bh=x+o2F2AdHzFbPieTGz4WK/dI9wZfrPqj5+d74g/ioZo=; b=jM5CERUS4Lr3tcJxQL8ZFaBt8sIm62mI4AuQkAwopvpIyuhcEbs6Ls9D/Svllk/l gvX/E+HqqCSoCY99f/BR2+pZe0HeWt78lciwzPTruq2TQMot2U7RplrYOqz87dZHQ2I nMIybVOiklnc8ipKAZneMcIqxOdvt3XeE8OWTvbQ=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.400.31\))
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
In-Reply-To: <DU2PR02MB10160110D4C72D682BA884802880E2@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 17:59:52 +0000
Cc: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <0100018f06f6dd43-4f1e99fc-2479-497c-862e-f41674426131-000000@email.amazonses.com>
References: <0100018eb57a21d8-26b38f41-a625-4d44-9248-09b349fd4212-000000@email.amazonses.com> <DU2PR02MB10160110D4C72D682BA884802880E2@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
To: BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.400.31)
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
X-SES-Outgoing: 2024.04.22-54.240.48.110
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/n6DLZMddIbsNpsNf1LcUJ7xfMDE>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Adoption call for notif-yang-04
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 17:59:55 -0000
Hi Med, > On Apr 18, 2024, at 9:45 AM, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote: > > Hi all, > > I see the potential behind this spec to fill a gap (refer to draft-netana-nmop-yang-kafka-integration). However, as currently written, there is a disconnect between what is claimed in the abstract, the "simple" sx module, and the xml/json/cbor mappings in the appendix. Hoping to understand this… > module: ietf-notification > > structure notification: > +-- eventTime yang:date-and-time > > It is true that there is no YANG module in RFC5277, but only an XML encoding. RFC 5277 defines an XSD, which was in-fashion at the time, but outdated now… > I would expect the authors to start from there and define a YANG module that echoes that XML structure + then enrich it with missing pieces (like eventTime) so that usual mapping specs naturally apply. Consistent with RFC 5277, this draft defines only “eventTime”, only using YANG instead of XSD. > I may be missing something, but some reasoning about the practicalities to produce data nodes and gluing it with other pieces is 5277 is needed. > > For these reasons, I'm afraid that this version is not ready for adoption. No comment on the above. Circling back to my "Hoping to understand this…” comment, I don’t understand the purpose of the examples in the appendix. As it seems that "how to encode" notifications in XML/JSON is well-understood, with the only missing piece being "how to validate” them, which is what this document enables, and so I was expecting to see an example illustrating that (to Andy’s point in another message, this draft should show the “augment-structure” syntax in use). Also, why does this draft focus on CBOR/SIDs? > Cheers, > Med K. > >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : netconf <netconf-bounces@ietf.org> De la part de Kent Watsen >> Envoyé : dimanche 7 avril 2024 00:14 >> À : netconf@ietf.org >> Objet : [netconf] Adoption call for notif-yang-04 >> >> >> NETCONF WG, >> >> This message starts a two week poll on adopting the following >> document: >> >> YANG model for NETCONF Event Notifications >> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2 >> Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ahuang-netconf-notif-yang- >> 04&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C211b4259f7534b07115 >> 208dc5686f24f%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C63848038486 >> 1736143%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLC >> JBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=dA8lFN7pH3tdAS7lRJph7D >> iQ5wV98Ee1sKGIBgcFeKA%3D&reserved=0 >> >> The poll ends April 20. >> >> Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not >> support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the >> document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd >> like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. >> >> No IPR is known for this document: >> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmail >> archive.ietf.org%2Farch%2Fmsg%2Fnetconf%2FoQVZ6Pf_novNfMB4RsnDxQibHpM% >> 2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C211b4259f7534b07115 >> 208dc5686f24f%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C63848038486 >> 1744910%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLC >> JBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=spWoSRnrRPQ0lHPnD%2FTl >> tr4wwzU7zn%2F1qxy5LBH1ujw%3D&reserved=0 >> >> PS: this document received strong support before, being very focused, >> providing just a module enabling validation of YANG "notification" >> messages. >> >> Kent and Per (as co-chairs) >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netconf mailing list >> netconf@ietf.org >> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww. >> ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fnetconf&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucada >> ir%40orange.com%7C211b4259f7534b07115208dc5686f24f%7C90c7a20af34b40bfb >> c48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638480384861751307%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8e >> yJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0% >> 7C%7C%7C&sdata=BKneFQbHB2s9rbSVFulEULoxnperrKIwme1oCEvGW6Q%3D&reserved >> =0 > ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. >
- [netconf] Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Kent Watsen
- [netconf] FW: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Thomas.Graf
- Re: [netconf] Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Andy Bierman
- Re: [netconf] Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Jean Quilbeuf
- Re: [netconf] Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Nils.Warnke
- Re: [netconf] Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Zhuoyao Lin
- Re: [netconf] Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Vincenzo Riccobene
- Re: [netconf] Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Voyer, Daniel
- Re: [netconf] Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [netconf] Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Jan Lindblad (jlindbla)
- Re: [netconf] Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Camilo Cardona
- Re: [netconf] Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Qin Wu
- Re: [netconf] Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Leonardo.Rodoni
- Re: [netconf] Adoption call for notif-yang-04 maqiufang (A)
- Re: [netconf] Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Paolo Lucente
- Re: [netconf] Adoption call for notif-yang-04 IGNACIO DOMINGUEZ MARTINEZ-CASANUEVA
- Re: [netconf] Adoption call for notif-yang-04 mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [netconf] Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Andy Bierman
- Re: [netconf] Adoption call for notif-yang-04 mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [netconf] Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Kent Watsen
- Re: [netconf] Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Andy Bierman
- Re: [netconf] Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Kent Watsen
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Thomas.Graf
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Andy Bierman
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Kent Watsen
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Andy Bierman
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Thomas.Graf
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Andy Bierman
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Andy Bierman
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Thomas.Graf
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Kent Watsen
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Andy Bierman
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Andy Bierman
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Andy Bierman
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Benoit Claise
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Andy Bierman
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Thomas.Graf
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Thomas.Graf
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Thomas.Graf
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Thomas.Graf
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Andy Bierman
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Andy Bierman
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Benoit Claise
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Kent Watsen
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Kent Watsen
- Re: [netconf] Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Per Andersson
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Kent Watsen
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Kent Watsen
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Andy Bierman
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Thomas.Graf
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Andy Bierman
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Thomas.Graf
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Thomas.Graf
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Andy Bierman
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Benoit Claise
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Andy Bierman
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Thomas.Graf
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Benoit Claise
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Andy Bierman
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Andy Bierman
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Andy Bierman
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Andy Bierman
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Andy Bierman
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Kent Watsen
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Thomas.Graf
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Kent Watsen
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Kent Watsen
- [netconf] Re: Adoption call for notif-yang-04 Alex Huang Feng