Re: [Netconf] Adoption poll for crypto-types and trust-anchors

"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <> Wed, 02 May 2018 12:58 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262BA126D05 for <>; Wed, 2 May 2018 05:58:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id apg-j5SEifyT for <>; Wed, 2 May 2018 05:58:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43B60126BF3 for <>; Wed, 2 May 2018 05:58:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=2144; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1525265933; x=1526475533; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Q05YkupIZjSwqWnRZMtpxNHFCUaJbjip56m7TCjMxpY=; b=MWBATJKAU6fZ5gkIHt0huYAoyd2ZtalgJiUPWbBtrG6qa++LuwZJHvEZ HL+2X3WjZGgacFZpMYl8UYuAwnfzVG4zmd4T+oZeElg7RBQ879coknmSZ o31DloQpaunZAiDfRopjigpNVihP2CRUcJXUQD9R/kp0xguH6ib56go3k E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,354,1520899200"; d="scan'208";a="381872565"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 May 2018 12:58:49 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w42Cwnjv014101 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 2 May 2018 12:58:49 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 2 May 2018 07:58:48 -0500
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Wed, 2 May 2018 07:58:48 -0500
From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <>
To: Kent Watsen <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] Adoption poll for crypto-types and trust-anchors
Thread-Index: AQHT4hVPE1StDHKmY0ObCbLSRyDgog==
Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 12:58:48 +0000
Message-ID: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.b.0.180311
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Adoption poll for crypto-types and trust-anchors
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 12:58:55 -0000

I support adoption of both drafts below.


On 2018-04-26, 5:11 PM, "Netconf on behalf of Kent Watsen" < on behalf of> wrote:

    This is the start of a *two* week poll for adopting the following two drafts as working group documents, specifically to replace draft-ietf-netconf-keystore, which would be removed as a working group document: 
    This call for adoption is the result of the Keystore draft presentation given in London.  When the various options were discussed, most preferred to move forward with these two drafts, as opposed to looking to do more factoring or extending to scope to include things not needed by our various client/server drafts.  No one expressed interest in moving forward with draft-ietf-netconf-keystore.  While we could separately confirm this result again on the list, we believe that an adoption call more efficiently achieves two goals at once.
    Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
    Kent (and Mahesh and Ignas)
    Netconf mailing list