Re: [netconf] YANG attributes in a datastore

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> Tue, 10 December 2019 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D88E120288 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 07:50:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dP0sAhODBP5B for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 07:50:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [IPv6:2001:1488:800:400::400]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8EFD120273 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 07:50:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from birdie (unknown [IPv6:2001:1488:fffe:6:a88f:7eff:fed2:45f8]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54210140C65; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 16:50:08 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1575993008; bh=6ZxQgfOntgnFD6ZJZG+qUYw9HRDMwwV/EgmXgbp80XM=; h=From:To:Date; b=EGtbBs6LSMuPaNNZv/fSrJnHBukJV1jjYW4WXDQfqCv7EOY2zPOLLMocfc42y/PrE kAxiz+FbHRKAAXccjHIv6S1C3TSTIGfWZGtDbdQYcQTwlBIBydJ/BD6CN278evUPp7 d9thSDhxw8RH3Ry9E8psu9OMU+8JOQI7CqDhpv9k=
Message-ID: <677480c1606c027b43afda383378a5a9320b15dd.camel@nic.cz>
From: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Cc: Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 16:50:08 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CABCOCHSgZYDOVC7cj=1jaf4_N4pWc0B5vXPDmtm93vw5srrRkQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5cce-5def9a00-11-66c7ce00@101566344> <20191210.150333.2171238725445540389.mbj@tail-f.com> <AM0PR0702MB3665FD1B4EFB1797333EE77DF05B0@AM0PR0702MB3665.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <514fe834eaa528c42f6dc31009399a3392b05dfe.camel@nic.cz> <CABCOCHSgZYDOVC7cj=1jaf4_N4pWc0B5vXPDmtm93vw5srrRkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: CZ.NIC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.100.3 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/nVv2GBoQMacXFAJNfnonNBQDI3w>
Subject: Re: [netconf] YANG attributes in a datastore
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 15:50:11 -0000

On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 07:42 -0800, Andy Bierman wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> YANG already has the "annotation" statement to define metadata.
> YANG has data-def-stmt to define data.  It would be very unwise
> to use metadata inside a leaf as if it were a leaf inside a container.

A typical example is a "comment" annotation - you want to permit it basically
everywhere but don't want to clutter the schema with "comment" leaves.

Lada 

> 
> 
> Andy
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 7:31 AM Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 14:58 +0000, Balázs Lengyel wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > If we try to standardize editing metadata, we will face a number of issues
> > > that need to be clarified:
> > > 
> > > - Will you model whether the attribute (metadata) is writable?  Config is
> > > not an allowed substatement in 
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7952#section-3
> > 
> > In my view annotations should never be configuration because they should not
> > influence the device state. The read-only/read-write propertly might be
> > useful.
> > 
> > > - Can a metadata have other additional properties? (mandatory,
> > cardinality,
> > > uniqueness of some kind?)
> > 
> > By design, annotations do not have a specific place in the schema, so they
> > cannot be mandatory.
> > 
> > Cardinality: if you mean annotations with a list of values, this was
> > discussed
> > but rejected due to difficulties with XML encoding.
> > 
> > > - If it is modified, will it be subject to validation, error-messages?
> > Will
> > > a bad metadata result in a failed error-config?
> > 
> > I would say yes because otherwise it makes no sense to define them and their
> > properties.
> > 
> > Lada
> > 
> > > 
> > > Regards Balazs
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: netconf <netconf-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Martin Bjorklund
> > > Sent: 2019. december 10., kedd 15:04
> > > To: mvasko@cesnet.cz
> > > Cc: netconf@ietf.org
> > > Subject: Re: [netconf] YANG attributes in a datastore
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Michal Vaško <mvasko@cesnet.cz> wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > we are thinking about adding support for arbitrary attributes [1] in 
> > > > our YANG/NETCONF datastore. To my knowledge, only the representation 
> > > > in XML or JSON is defined and standardized but there are no guidelines 
> > > > for editing (CRUD) these attributes.
> > > > 
> > > > So, my question is a rather general one, regarding implementations 
> > > > that support editing these attributes, would you mind sharing some 
> > > > basic ideas or principles used? Or is this outside any consensus and 
> > > > each implementation is free to handle this completely in its own 
> > > > fashion? Thanks for any input.
> > > 
> > > I think this depends on the attribute defintion.  Some attributes are
> > > read-only from the northbound's protocol point of view.  Internally in the
> > > server you may need some API to set/change them of course.  Some other
> > > attributes are read-write.
> > > 
> > > In our implementation we support a few read-write attributes (and some
> > > read-only).  Here's a simple example (in an edit-config):
> > > 
> > >   <foo annotation="hello"/>
> > > 
> > > This would set/change the "annotation" attribute's value to "hello",
> > > regardless of its previous value.
> > > 
> > > To delete an annotation, you would do:
> > > 
> > >   <foo annotation=""/>
> > > 
> > > Each of our attributes has a special value that means "delete" (in most
> > > cases it is the empty string.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > /martin
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Michal
> > > > 
> > > > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7952
> > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > netconf mailing list
> > > > netconf@ietf.org
> > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
> > > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > netconf mailing list
> > > netconf@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > netconf mailing list
> > > netconf@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
-- 
Ladislav Lhotka
Head, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67