IETF Logo Mail Archive

[netconf] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netconf-over-quic-00.txt

Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Wed, 25 September 2024 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <01000192298d9e6b-78047b57-e2f8-4359-be77-f7c68e835130-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17605C151991 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 07:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ekWh0QCBGhWW for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 07:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a48-110.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a48-110.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.48.110]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A3BFC14F704 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 07:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=ug7nbtf4gccmlpwj322ax3p6ow6yfsug; d=amazonses.com; t=1727274000; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:Feedback-ID; bh=hAWbiUSX12Z1lYVq1+Azb+hl9Or6jfhH8S7grU5ZtPU=; b=mD4AkKzYuDE2qZaooVYtCLWQ1aidELHXXVNBpKIESBsNLy22eq/J+sjlSk+WmYuw t0CYjyPypb1ZNjQM93JqNeaxS9zRsf7u8lWii2pqnPO2zUAiqxrTeGz4BpntzXE4RmO 4+bzM6h9IDWdeFaiq20Yg7OPl/W2IWL5J5gsjqp8=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.400.31\))
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
In-Reply-To: <023FAAE1-9B4B-4364-917F-70985EAE7D1A@viagenie.ca>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 14:19:59 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <01000192298d9e6b-78047b57-e2f8-4359-be77-f7c68e835130-000000@email.amazonses.com>
References: <172722605655.189.7998165814409208575@dt-datatracker-6c75f7dfff-hrjh6> <DU2PR02MB10160C2646B53684C9188161788692@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <023FAAE1-9B4B-4364-917F-70985EAE7D1A@viagenie.ca>
To: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.400.31)
Feedback-ID: ::1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
X-SES-Outgoing: 2024.09.25-54.240.48.110
Message-ID-Hash: ZCWBUDYXIPNMHJFMBRYLPQGSH7GFV53V
X-Message-ID-Hash: ZCWBUDYXIPNMHJFMBRYLPQGSH7GFV53V
X-MailFrom: 01000192298d9e6b-78047b57-e2f8-4359-be77-f7c68e835130-000000@amazonses.watsen.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-netconf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [netconf] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netconf-over-quic-00.txt
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/nW2BRAp2FJ9Dmwaj0cNgdsFkFi0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:netconf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:netconf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:netconf-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Marc,

> Sure. We decided to _not_ make any change to the draft from individual to wg -00 so that it will be easier to trace for the wg. And we already have comments from during the adoption call that are being processed. 

It’s for the best that way.

Please also find and address comments raised in my adoption-call review.

Kent / contributor

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status