Re: [netconf] [Netconf] WG adoption poll for draft-lengyel-netconf-notification-capabilities-02

[Mahesh Jethanandani <[e-mail]>]

+ netconf mailing list.

> On Sep 27, 2019, at 2:13 AM, Balázs Lengyel <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> I have a vague recollection that we did discuss this. However some comments:
> -         Minimum-dampening-period is now included in the notification capabilities
> 
> -         subscription-priority is not present in either rfc 8639 or 8641. There are some QOS parameters an weighs but not subscription-priority
> 
> excluded-change is not included. No one has asked for it during the elapsed 14 months.  IMHO is not a capability.  It could have been a feature in the original spec. 
> Sorry for the late reply.
> Regards Balazs
>  
> From: Mahesh Jethanandani <[e-mail]> 
> Sent: 2019. szeptember 23., hétfő 19:24
> To: wangzitao <[e-mail]>
> Cc: Balázs Lengyel <[e-mail]>; Kent Watsen <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: [Netconf] WG adoption poll for draft-lengyel-netconf-notification-capabilities-02
>  
> Hi Michael/Balazs,
>  
> Did you have a private exchange on this question? I do not see a response on the netconf mailing list.
> 
> 
> On Aug 8, 2018, at 7:24 PM, wangzitao <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>  
> Hi WG,
> I have read this document and I support WG adoption of this draft.
>  
> Hi Balazs and Alex,
> There are some comments. As my understanding, the “ietf-notification-capabilities” model can be used to present the server’s basic capabilities to indicate that whether it can support on-change push. IMHO, there are some capabilities that also need to be considered to present, for example:
> -          Whether the server supports “excluded-change”;
> -          Whether the server supports “subscription-priority”;
> -          Whether the server supports “dampening-period”, etc.
> 
> Best Regards!
> -Michael
>  
> 发件人: Netconf [mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>] 代表 Mahesh Jethanandani
> 发送时间: 2018年8月8日 10:39
> 收件人: Netconf <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
> 主题: [Netconf] WG adoption poll for draft-lengyel-netconf-notification-capabilities-02
>  
> In the NETCONF 102 WG meeting, authors presented the following document, and asked for WG adoption.
>  
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lengyel-netconf-notification-capabilities-02 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lengyel-netconf-notification-capabilities-02>
>  
> This starts an adoption poll for the above draft. Please indicate your support or objection to the adoption poll. If objecting, please state your reasons by responding on this thread.
>  
> Thanks.
>  
> Mahesh & Kent.

Mahesh Jethanandani
[e-mail]