IETF Logo Mail Archive

[netconf] Re: [IANA #1373109] expert review for draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server (xml-registry)

Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Tue, 15 April 2025 03:21 UTC

Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: netconf@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10411C07702 for <netconf@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 20:21:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=textuality.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W9VsA-1_PL9e for <netconf@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 20:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102d.google.com (mail-pj1-x102d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B4891C07561 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 20:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102d.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-30332dfc820so5704236a91.2 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 20:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=textuality.com; s=google; t=1744687294; x=1745292094; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=b0oHe6DPuPO+ZrI+cHooHvXvrXwPupqYB8Bz2h+x6RA=; b=aCHaO2OR1IZoMIndCqo+FuvMaM3uMellZ3jaTbTX8MpZOm5rIC/uis3k+lqj3aNwSM 7YZjo7xFG8AmViR1UVw4JIsbjgSqEVOKcYf8rq6AeWN7txZiSq8gPJtOz+92h0GVdbcK UMiR7jtAD64adIanwKJXPeOvLIh6f8YKsyRyY=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1744687294; x=1745292094; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=b0oHe6DPuPO+ZrI+cHooHvXvrXwPupqYB8Bz2h+x6RA=; b=v6auN3fn8ymtGnfKKe9SJ3fGLSZz/SRBpiKh91N85AzZ7IPOLsXIogLZGXpEolIj1p KZlVS2ZrbhBXTVQJPbLxou9HJjrsbCrryTwbH5r7hZR6RgdK1To9jubliaVKdlZTThGW ul/WaAtDHK9r5ypdEXMWWPR6zozkn0FsIQ6unRE46Lt4/HzYCuVNchU26SVJeGRwt/Cu SFP5nSSK3OmXafEpXjm3Eva6ON4RuJyQJfEVOV1aHFsEjaG038N2+5ix+6EiGMjHfgaD 3bGRbVd2YiEiHqiKnHxnuuf7TCEAENBJbFX9DPsQbOcGBtmt5Y9bG6aC/mGDzyABm05w mIFA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy8WdmjBYXwbhSCWXpJMxIFZdrlHAR1EBS1ip+byHKIUMXO2HrG BOo/t9FQ/JhmxZDY7rXh+Q4uQUnrzoOQ5MD79oF8zHyEYZjGk6CEupBUQF+uTmhUGnq+36Cq2Vl H7WcOcu6ajzGC5Wc/UPPP4TbhuYCe5eDdyWv+BoNe0qHmw1RTLcY=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsTwrdPsaeDZBg2mlcCg1aV+vSsGJvBxd3/xzjZZkOErsV8EXDf6QJ1yLzBPCY GJ9FltsQo+0GoPmz1FUbUP93clAcOb9HBfTrvR7uP1PwJMZ/UmAhSRgk1pjXZ9v8ES7Iu0nSdOg cmJs4d9usTGUtQgPw/wpZ08MScwmyFjXBoUj8koZR+/Hqr1XyOM3RPiJM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGb+o+2NkpDn6URcDRpwZ6llB+CRflEU2SRrZ2uIdVFEqnX+WmPXQp2SEK+1U8CqmuBufe2CuZzvphwbPDL864=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4d0a:b0:301:1c11:aa74 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-308236712aamr19851670a91.28.1744687294307; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 20:21:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1064022179695 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 20:21:33 -0700
Received: from 1064022179695 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 03:21:30 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mimestream 1.6.3)
References: <RT-Ticket-1373109@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-2902562-1725059115-1736.1373109-9-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-2904058-1725061607-1792.1373109-9-0@icann.org> <CAHBU6isA5UQXGDxYs03UnRwSS+exN=qjOTi3Kqik3QS1sd2NTA@mail.gmail.com> <rt-5.0.3-379216-1725240045-1408.1373109-9-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-757840-1744160361-686.1373109-9-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-1789971-1744686675-915.1373109-9-0@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <rt-5.0.3-1789971-1744686675-915.1373109-9-0@icann.org>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 20:21:33 -0700
X-Gm-Features: ATxdqUHvKZJuBmC8ilZTem91wJSk3ufp67yuPK3Z27MtFK_ao2WmUWcdcDHqLWo
Message-ID: <CAHBU6ivc4xun-gHwC7cEPok9-T-tYouiswSFDMCChX_D+NFnLw@mail.gmail.com>
To: drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006c03310632c8aa19"
Message-ID-Hash: UGRN5SMKK6S74BGP5HS42HXADJGURQBN
X-Message-ID-Hash: UGRN5SMKK6S74BGP5HS42HXADJGURQBN
X-MailFrom: tbray@textuality.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-netconf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: netconf@ietf.org, mt@lowentropy.net
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [netconf] Re: [IANA #1373109] expert review for draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server (xml-registry)
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/qcYT06WBQQzstGSR5dZFojaDIjk>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:netconf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:netconf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:netconf-leave@ietf.org>

 I don’t see anything troubling.  -T

On Apr 14, 2025 at 8:11:15 PM, Amanda Baber via RT <
drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> wrote:

> Hi Tim, Martin,
>
> Would you have a chance to double-check this one before Thursday? It's on
> this week's telechat agenda.
>
> thanks,
> Amanda
>
> On Wed Apr 09 00:59:21 2025, amanda.baber wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
>
>
> Can you confirm that the current version of this document is still OK?
>
> It looks like you reviewed -38, and there are changes in the XML:
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-
>
> client-server
>
>
> thanks,
>
> Amanda
>
>
> On Mon Sep 02 01:20:45 2024, tbray@textuality.com wrote:
>
> > I see no problems, aside from YANG’s usual and regrettable use of
>
> > namespace prefixes in text content, which means that it will not work
>
> > unless the XML processor being used supports this nonstandard
>
> > exception.
>
> > For example, <map-type>x509c2n:specified</map-type>
>
> >
>
> > I know that this is a common idiom in YANG and is unlikely to cause
>
> > real-world problems, but I wish they wouldn’t do it.
>
> >
>
> > On Aug 30, 2024 at 4:46:48 PM, David Dong via RT <
>
> > drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > Dear Martin Thomson, Tim Bray (cc: netconf WG),
>
> > >
>
> > > As the designated experts for the ns registry, can you review the
>
> > > proposed
>
> > > registration in draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server-38 for
>
> > > us?
>
> > > Please
>
> > > see:
>
> > >
>
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-
>
> > > client-
>
> > > server/
>
> > >
>
> > > The due date is September 13th.
>
> > >
>
> > > If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication,
>
> > > we'll
>
> > > make the registration at:
>
> > >
>
> > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-registry/
>
> > >
>
> > > Unless you ask us to wait for the other reviewer, we’ll act on the
>
> > > first
>
> > > response we receive.
>
> > >
>
> > > With thanks,
>
> > >
>
> > > David Dong
>
> > > IANA Services Sr. Specialist
>
> > >
>
>
>

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status