Re: [Netconf] Reminder: Action by Dec 20th 2013 PLEASE: Draft charter after consensus call

"Lisa Huang (yihuan)" <yihuan@cisco.com> Thu, 19 December 2013 20:21 UTC

Return-Path: <yihuan@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186F81AE581 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:21:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.039
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.039 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07G06jAvEw4P for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:21:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B3E1AE235 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:21:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3398; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1387484498; x=1388694098; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=4ETa3r3tYNkII3kYVS0qymc+IuSZpduo7931oxKetx0=; b=Ncb6LLf50cl4q9Gh94Gwuxc4oHk+bjPSLDdvWA83Eiv/fLq3jvXmeqdf kzL7VSRR3FxSRgjUZwVupNrBEStSe5kdkBVmQ7PHSdK8AfH2vo9WP5GF/ KOB/9+NPjpazxz5R6uJhPEiwid7oNXKEJzWfwSQrAJt7kQqv5TlmtaeBi Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgQFAGZUs1KtJXG8/2dsb2JhbABZgws4VbhgT4EYFnSCJQEBAQQBAQE3NB0BCBgeNwslAgQBEgmHew3KbxeOJhsBAVEFhDYEmBaSFIFtgT6BcTk
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,514,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="7987213"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Dec 2013 20:21:37 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com [173.37.183.79]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rBJKLbEi000690 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:21:37 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.6.155]) by xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com ([173.37.183.79]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:21:36 -0600
From: "Lisa Huang (yihuan)" <yihuan@cisco.com>
To: "Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>, Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] Reminder: Action by Dec 20th 2013 PLEASE: Draft charter after consensus call
Thread-Index: AQHO9njRcsoTthT74EWvwxfLqjMn65paMpUAgAGuxYA=
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:21:36 +0000
Message-ID: <CED891FE.F81E8%yihuan@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <52B17B74.1050200@bwijnen.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
x-originating-ip: [10.21.86.218]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <EB1F85D9F5A982458E4B0D0F936F5F3F@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Reminder: Action by Dec 20th 2013 PLEASE: Draft charter after consensus call
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:21:42 -0000

I support this charter.

Here is my opinion on item 4: I believe the goal is not to provide
programmatic interface, but a set of standards about how to relate restful
path with yang path and how to simplify RESTful application to access
Netconf datastore, etc.



On 12/18/13 2:39 AM, "Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net> wrote:

>We've had many emails on our WG mailing list, so maybe this one
>did escape your attention. Please let us (WG hcairs) know if you
>have any issues with this draft new WG charter. If we do not hear
>any by Dec 20th, we will pss it to our AD for approval by th IESG.
>
>It is always nice to hear that WG participants do agree too!
>
>Bert and Mehmet
>
>On 12/11/13 2:56 PM, Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich) wrote:
>> Dear NETCONF WG,
>> we had two consensus calls ended on December 4, 2013.
>>
>>   * Verifing session consensus with the maillist on RFC5539bis new port
>>and YANG module separation
>>     _http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/current/msg08445.html_
>>   * Verifing session consensus on RESTCONF as WG item with the maillist
>>     _http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/current/msg08444.html_
>>
>> The co-chairs think that there was support for the action points and no
>>objections to the consensus from the Vancouver NETCONF session.
>> We think we can go one step further.The co-chairs agreed to have
>>Reverse SSH as a separate document for the time being.
>> Below is the relevant part of the draft charter. Please comment by
>>December 20, 2013 EOB PT.
>> We will then pass it on to our AD for approval by IESG.
>> Bert & Mehmet
>> ---------------
>>    In the current phase of NETCONF's incremental development the
>>workgroup
>>    will focus on following items:
>>    1. Develop the call home mechanism for the mandatory SSH binding
>>(Reverse
>>    SSH) providing a server-initiated session establishment.
>>    2. Advance NETCONF over TLS to be in-line with NETCONF 1.1 (i.e.,
>>update
>>    RFC 5539) and add the call home mechanism to provide a
>>server-initiated
>>    session establishment.
>>    3. Combine the server configuration data models from Reverse SSH and
>>    RFC5539bis drafts in a separate YANG module.
>>    4. Develop a RESTful protocol (RESTCONF) that provides a programmatic
>>    interface for accessing data defined in YANG, using the datastores
>>    defined in NETCONF. The two parts concerning RESTCONF protocol over
>>    HTTP and the YANG patch operation will be prepared in separate
>>drafts.
>> Goals and Milestones:
>>    Jan 2014 - Submit initial WG drafts for RESTCONF as WG item
>>    Apr 2014 - WGLC for RFC5539bis
>>    Apr 2014 - WGLC for Reverse SSH
>>    Apr 2014 - WGLC for NETCONF server configuration data model
>>    May 2014 - Submit Reverse SSH to AD/IESG for consideration as
>>Proposed Standard
>>    May 2014 - Submit RFC5539bis to AD/IESG for consideration as
>>Proposed Standard
>>    Jun 2014 - WGLC for RESTCONF
>>    Aug 2014 - Submit RESTCONF to AD/IESG for consideration as Proposed
>>Standard
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Netconf mailing list
>> Netconf@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Netconf mailing list
>Netconf@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf