Re: [Netconf] Deprecate or Keep the text related to PSK-based authentication (was WGLC for draft-ietf-netconf-tls-04.txt)
"David B Harrington" <dbharrington@comcast.net> Wed, 01 October 2008 22:03 UTC
Return-Path: <netconf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: netconf-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8073A68D3; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0959D3A68D3 for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hDkzlz4i8TUO for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from QMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.32]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD9D3A6846 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from OMTA10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.28]) by QMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id MS6X1a0040cZkys53a3vdQ; Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:03:55 +0000
Received: from Harrington73653 ([24.128.66.199]) by OMTA10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Ma3v1a0054HwxpC3Wa3v48; Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:03:55 +0000
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=ZMF4x87TjMsA:10 a=iO7KYi4ROgAA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=XPfUjVNie98wR-IXQ5MA:9 a=xadlurcj0VPzbEQP9OcA0d6M9V4A:4 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=50e4U0PicR4A:10
From: David B Harrington <dbharrington@comcast.net>
To: badra@isima.fr, netconf@ietf.org
References: <56872.88.164.98.77.1222886768.squirrel@www.isima.fr>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:03:55 -0400
Message-ID: <013101c92411$98db1b70$0600a8c0@china.huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: Ackj9jJTfAp5vAqcTV+gkunNbo0r/gAGzCpQ
In-Reply-To: <56872.88.164.98.77.1222886768.squirrel@www.isima.fr>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Deprecate or Keep the text related to PSK-based authentication (was WGLC for draft-ietf-netconf-tls-04.txt)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/netconf>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org
Hi, I do not see the benefit of mentioning PSK, and support removing mention of it. dbh > -----Original Message----- > From: netconf-bounces@ietf.org > [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of badra@isima.fr > Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 2:46 PM > To: netconf@ietf.org > Subject: [Netconf] Deprecate or Keep the text related to > PSK-based authentication (was WGLC for draft-ietf-netconf-tls-04.txt) > > Dear all, > > During the discussion related to Netconf over TLS, I did get the > impression that many WG members thought that PSK-based > authentication is > not suitable for Netconf, and the NETCONF over TLS > specification doesn't > need to mention it at all. > > I think there are two basic options: > > (A) Don't mention PSK-based authentication at all. > > (B) Keep the current text. > > The motivations for option (A) is detailed by Tom Petch > (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/current/msg03854 > .html) and > by Juergen Schoenwaelder > (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/current/msg03817.html) From netconf-bounces@ietf.org Wed Oct 1 15:03:32 2008 Return-Path: <netconf-bounces@ietf.org> X-Original-To: netconf-archive@lists.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-netconf-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8073A68D3; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:03:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0959D3A68D3 for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:03:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hDkzlz4i8TUO for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:03:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from QMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.32]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD9D3A6846 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:03:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from OMTA10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.28]) by QMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id MS6X1a0040cZkys53a3vdQ; Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:03:55 +0000 Received: from Harrington73653 ([24.128.66.199]) by OMTA10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Ma3v1a0054HwxpC3Wa3v48; Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:03:55 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=ZMF4x87TjMsA:10 a=iO7KYi4ROgAA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=XPfUjVNie98wR-IXQ5MA:9 a=xadlurcj0VPzbEQP9OcA0d6M9V4A:4 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=50e4U0PicR4A:10 From: "David B Harrington" <dbharrington@comcast.net> To: <badra@isima.fr>, <netconf@ietf.org> References: <56872.88.164.98.77.1222886768.squirrel@www.isima.fr> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 18:03:55 -0400 Message-ID: <013101c92411$98db1b70$0600a8c0@china.huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Ackj9jJTfAp5vAqcTV+gkunNbo0r/gAGzCpQ In-Reply-To: <56872.88.164.98.77.1222886768.squirrel@www.isima.fr> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Subject: Re: [Netconf] Deprecate or Keep the text related to PSK-based authentication (was WGLC for draft-ietf-netconf-tls-04.txt) X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/netconf> List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org> List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: netconf-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: netconf-bounces@ietf.org Hi, I do not see the benefit of mentioning PSK, and support removing mention of it. dbh > -----Original Message----- > From: netconf-bounces@ietf.org > [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of badra@isima.fr > Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 2:46 PM > To: netconf@ietf.org > Subject: [Netconf] Deprecate or Keep the text related to > PSK-based authentication (was WGLC for draft-ietf-netconf-tls-04.txt) > > Dear all, > > During the discussion related to Netconf over TLS, I did get the > impression that many WG members thought that PSK-based > authentication is > not suitable for Netconf, and the NETCONF over TLS > specification doesn't > need to mention it at all. > > I think there are two basic options: > > (A) Don't mention PSK-based authentication at all. > > (B) Keep the current text. > > The motivations for option (A) is detailed by Tom Petch > (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/current/msg03854 > .html) and > by Juergen Schoenwaelder > (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/current/msg03817.> > Please express you preference on the list for one of these > two options by > the WGLC deadline. > > Best regards, > Badra > _______________________________________________ > Netconf mailing list > Netconf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf > _______________________________________________ Netconf mailing list Netconf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf html) > > Please express you preference on the list for one of these > two options by > the WGLC deadline. > > Best regards, > Badra > _______________________________________________ > Netconf mailing list > Netconf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf > _______________________________________________ Netconf mailing list Netconf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
- [Netconf] Deprecate or Keep the text related to P… badra
- Re: [Netconf] Deprecate or Keep the text related … David B Harrington