[netconf] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6241 (5401)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 18 October 2019 19:39 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E35B1120817; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 12:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dpx1reQtfom5; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 12:39:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E35991200DE; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 12:39:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 40FB3B80C3C; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 12:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
To: rohitrranade@huawei.com, rob.enns@gmail.com, mbj@tail-f.com, j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de, andy@yumaworks.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ibagdona@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, netconf@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20191018193915.40FB3B80C3C@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 12:39:15 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/rgMCmD31LCQQ7ZgOAM__cIcXpOI>
Subject: [netconf] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6241 (5401)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 19:39:22 -0000
The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC6241, "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5401 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Technical Reported by: Rohit R Ranade <rohitrranade@huawei.com> Date Reported: 2018-06-21 Held by: Ignas Bagdonas (IESG) Section: 8.9.1 Original Text ------------- The XPath expression MUST return a node set. If it does not return a node set, the operation fails with an "invalid-value" error. Corrected Text -------------- The XPath expression MUST return a node set. If it does not return a node set, the operation fails with an <error-tag> value of "invalid-value". Notes ----- It is unclear what is the meaning of "invalid-value" "error". Since the xpath will be part of "select" attribute, we can assume that a server can return a "bad-attribute" error-tag and having error-message indicating invalid-value for the attribute. This clarifies the <error-tag> to be used in such cases. In other places, where error-tag has been mentioned, it is clear that "invalid-value" <error-tag> must be used. -------------------------------------- RFC6241 (draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis-10) -------------------------------------- Title : Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) Publication Date : June 2011 Author(s) : R. Enns, Ed., M. Bjorklund, Ed., J. Schoenwaelder, Ed., A. Bierman, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Network Configuration Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [netconf] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC62… RFC Errata System