[netconf] [IANA #1373109] expert review for draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server (xml-registry)

[Amanda Baber via RT <[e-mail]>]

Hi Tim,

Can you confirm that the current version of this document is still OK? It looks like you reviewed -38, and there are changes in the XML:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server

thanks,
Amanda

On Mon Sep 02 01:20:45 2024, [e-mail] wrote:
> I see no problems, aside from YANG’s usual and regrettable use of
> namespace prefixes in text content, which means that it will not work
> unless the XML processor being used supports this nonstandard
> exception.
> For example, <map-type>x509c2n:specified</map-type>
> 
> I know that this is a common idiom in YANG and is unlikely to cause
> real-world problems, but I wish they wouldn’t do it.
> 
> On Aug 30, 2024 at 4:46:48 PM, David Dong via RT <
> [e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> > Dear Martin Thomson, Tim Bray (cc: netconf WG),
> >
> > As the designated experts for the ns registry, can you review the
> > proposed
> > registration in draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server-38 for us?
> > Please
> > see:
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-
> > server/
> >
> > The due date is September 13th.
> >
> > If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication,
> > we'll
> > make the registration at:
> >
> > https://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-registry/
> >
> > Unless you ask us to wait for the other reviewer, we’ll act on the
> > first
> > response we receive.
> >
> > With thanks,
> >
> > David Dong
> > IANA Services Sr. Specialist
> >