[netconf] Results of "Adoption Call for draft-mahesh-netconf-https-notif-00"

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Tue, 10 September 2019 21:05 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96742120255 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eeYO4b0JAlT6 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:05:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x844.google.com (mail-qt1-x844.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::844]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D32D41200A1 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x844.google.com with SMTP id v11so22483413qto.13 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5eIDkh1Dz9PiPH6kqdQEgz3b8O8z479HSmV8cpbbC+o=; b=WCTZ52KwYm7hugtctspgj4tIz0rKy/tDL9SJ6do1y8zfmNNQcpVPgpNVcf04bFiyPF 2yeambaJLQTNlR7Gk1Qw9cWTvH2FMKwTFXvpCyFT+9gfOCRJwga76NwWzv55olUJvMGe xyQZwlN05sNcjR+meO8LKeAh2IrPP1QGA1T3y/T85z4k3vumLKksKlkr4hBQN9WIE6aB wa265LQdmKwPpd9I6yUBU4qyzngrORi9kSZtstUzHN17g5RTYuV/1EHcIudeN+yzwAIN JWg4CB2+Ed7m2HVyNHgl3gt4NJypamXLsHR7+RF6cU4QthpblZTJDj2NKNdyBM1z2ZR4 TPnA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5eIDkh1Dz9PiPH6kqdQEgz3b8O8z479HSmV8cpbbC+o=; b=lIxu6tjXm4bnAjFefmfClwYzn/yqE0uCKoT1wZUvV+19bWuNAC/14ukSpxy6fdAFtm 9jT8xmPemkSj98SG4seL9t2hSmoBVEitPEMtoS1nDWSuA/UDmV4ldJU7T83y1l41WYg+ +cbBCJkZCanc+lldqI/gDqItsoMMZREzmDBT80TPDRt6zVzsZFDadfcMaltT/QOuGkHN /og8ee/j54oW0mzdILEnmOKdU3oqNJWQpypYBEVhcGUMxyVfldAPMwIH0yALxSK2eSyl Ib1qMuEO++7eJfbbW4vaZPeFPVX2Fu6xWX9JB3Qk1x7HPy/LwxLMTRYRvP5c0jAQG1Y/ sBfA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXQJVMQsPOOsPjSgAJDgtnVNB+PZPF3ST3wAQyHqi0wCVETHTYR +emX5IhG3yKxzYWObDe6hNPHmmN5fMpU4E0m4xCE9bYlQfc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwU68DW0pxKQm5YC0v2iuAFHrNhHlZeiVQMjTC/jQMs8ro/rTLzMXBRuhKFk1rpQbioMpBnZAUFpk9udkG+H4M=
X-Received: by 2002:aed:2f42:: with SMTP id l60mr30638561qtd.315.1568149521152; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 17:04:45 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_i+8XD_58TG0_8JRyqnngEgHXCWFwT3O0Q7emSttfYG8oQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: netconf@ietf.org, Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona.ietf@gmail.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/szyLWLT6GAsR1PeJRNrLnkwcDz4>
Subject: [netconf] Results of "Adoption Call for draft-mahesh-netconf-https-notif-00"
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 21:05:25 -0000

Hi there all,

As both Netconf chairs are also authors of
draft-mahesh-netconf-https-notif, they felt that it was inappropriate
for them to also call consensus on this adoptionI'd suggest that the
chair deputize a WG participant to make and needed consensus calls
which may , and so have asked me to do so.

I've reviewed the meeting video, the minutes, and also the call for
adoption thread (I wasn't subscribed to the mailing list, and so I
read it on the archives, and cannot reply to the original thread). I
view there being consensus for adoption of this document -- authors,
please resubmit as draft-ietf-netconf-...  I'd also suggest that the
chair deputize a WG participant to make and needed consensus calls
which may come up during progression of the document.

As noted by Kent in
Martin made a number of good points -- not sure if you'd like to
address there before or after submitting the WG version of the
There was also a view that the WG should be focusing on getting the
client-server work done -- this seems like a fine idea, but I think
that, if the authors have time, they can work on this in parallel...

Thank you all,

I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.