Re: [netconf] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-06

Mahesh Jethanandani <> Tue, 15 December 2020 18:38 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482933A14EA; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:38:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tOKWdSEralsl; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:37:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::435]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 988863A14D7; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:37:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id 11so15018988pfu.4; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:37:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=UVF/j75w7+L7XIEcn9yaMInNOe1nVFz06mDECI0/wSI=; b=c6WHHEuzyxJQJO6vl7daYP7pRnJJ2ZxsFRQF/Cvezf7LYl9z9IWDrEu7FWCmvsAdB9 RrKGPNdybGHoq4YZ/ROMfyvCIgNnmgNe2NhKluqg0bumRs8qUIxb+A8J15u9sObzJyRH yZnoq2CBtnEKa8xwHkXg4ms7/bBsZsDP/GVk9bLG71qnkLFKqz++q74wDEaXVBQaVnRl IYhQIYEfauPKeL6YrgULQf/dahnojCc5rdo/GeIl6rpPUS6oPUADwt+i7uakJjfdcgcq VhQ9BtkFYejcmQPuwtmrCuJu2LRYxeVe8l19xJYPp7a+OF6AL8DSUes4NLwiYZe97rk+ A4nw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=UVF/j75w7+L7XIEcn9yaMInNOe1nVFz06mDECI0/wSI=; b=uGis5J9xjaxDWTgDfq4y6idp4jt6FrRxEybXPBbJ1ucfvXu0YaR8jQ0Lh6vVUXQvTW 8jVHrkzwdGJRNjRo7nUIivr7655ejiV8CU8zgaphdapZrrfgqecR7h8aK5JnAAjp2N1z OU3Vi5n/0gb5YlxfFYKPsenXslC9WCpuQ+oAS3bJH/iR04Gq/Qopk7XCbGPE70/JfNx4 l8DW02eBFifzEiXUaPCfyckmsvJuQEhGFvBJWubO+/iX7XDi6XsgEwKWYaBponkXZAPi RLfdL9OrqmCkhJ8bwsfPzTGVkHeLQyxukOBtEwIEVUtIXzt/gwisq7XlZ/KU8ZFcAXeA lzfw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532t3fKtr8RPXc7esH9tq0WKq6WTDu21JQRArv572108bP9geXqn GI/UFRwD3mzzO4WBKpeoQQ0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzm6MxfNNfa81ZWC4s3RG+s+KnzCREwTCKa2c/JNFBHVlDL6qyg3z6oQ3jV4fngXKJM/fsHfg==
X-Received: by 2002:a65:44c2:: with SMTP id g2mr30269975pgs.256.1608057477948; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:37:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5600:5020:1142:ad9:dab3:7838? ([2601:647:5600:5020:1142:ad9:dab3:7838]) by with ESMTPSA id f7sm23032942pfe.30.2020. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:37:57 -0800 (PST)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <>
Message-Id: <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_22CF8D52-B6B2-4848-91D2-7C597AC88A86"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.\))
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:37:56 -0800
In-Reply-To: <>
Cc: "" <>, "" <>, "" <>
To: Robert Wilton <>
References: <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-06
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 18:38:00 -0000

No, I am not not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Thanks.

> On Dec 15, 2020, at 9:43 AM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) <> wrote:
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
> As part of preparation for WG LC (which is planned for after the holidays):
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to the draft identified above?
> Please state either:
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
> If yes to the above, please state either:
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author.
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> Please note, the reason that I am making this request rather than the
> WG chairs is because both chairs are listed as authors on this document.
> Thank you,
> Rob (OPS AD)
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.

Mahesh Jethanandani