Re: [netconf] SN and indirection
Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Fri, 30 August 2019 12:24 UTC
Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65F0120843 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 05:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HVfqOblFsaau for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 05:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD6E12018D for <netconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 05:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (h-46-233.A165.priv.bahnhof.se [46.59.46.233]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 765B61AE0187; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 14:24:05 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 14:24:05 +0200
Message-Id: <20190830.142405.429358952690470664.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: kent+ietf@watsen.net
Cc: netconf@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <0100016ce21ab15a-16b3c8d4-0722-4ea7-a6c0-081689ae42f4-000000@email.amazonses.com>
References: <0100016ce21ab15a-16b3c8d4-0722-4ea7-a6c0-081689ae42f4-000000@email.amazonses.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.2 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/tW3aGSnfmot5uQS-Dq_nGkiEgkQ>
Subject: Re: [netconf] SN and indirection
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 12:24:08 -0000
Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> wrote: > In the https-notif adoption call, Martin writes: > > > (*) An observation: This module introduces a level of indirection for > > receivers; something we should have done in the > > subscribed-notifications model directly. Perhaps we should revisit > > that model and add the indirection there instead. > > What is meant by “revisit”? SN is in Auth48. Pull it back or start a > bis now? I meant a bis. /martin > FWIW, it seems that SN also lacks a structure conducive to supporting > multi-stream originators. > > Kent // any hat
- [netconf] SN and indirection Kent Watsen
- Re: [netconf] SN and indirection Balázs Lengyel
- Re: [netconf] SN and indirection Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netconf] SN and indirection Kent Watsen
- Re: [netconf] SN and indirection Eric Voit (evoit)
- Re: [netconf] SN and indirection Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netconf] SN and indirection Mahesh Jethanandani