Re: [netconf] Adoption-suitability for draft-wang-netconf-adaptive-subscription

王巍 <wangw36@chinatelecom.cn> Tue, 18 August 2020 12:09 UTC

Return-Path: <wangw36@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96FEA3A094B for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 05:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_HDRS_LCASE=1.997, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L3C2p0r9h_Jo for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 05:09:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chinatelecom.cn (prt-mail.chinatelecom.cn [42.123.76.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC7E3A092D for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 05:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clientip-124.127.46.2?logid-fd2f4e5c20dd4b518789e32a58626ce8 (unknown [172.18.0.92]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id 01BA9280090; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 20:09:19 +0800 (CST)
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_IP: wmail.172.18.0.92.2043507644
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: WEBMAIL
Received: from ([172.18.0.99]) by App0021 with ESMTP id fd2f4e5c20dd4b518789e32a58626ce8 for kent+ietf@watsen.net; Tue Aug 18 20:09:20 2020
X-Transaction-ID: fd2f4e5c20dd4b518789e32a58626ce8
X-filter-score: filter<0>
X-Real-From: wangw36@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 172.18.0.99
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Sender: wangw36@chinatelecom.cn
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 20:09:19 +0800 (CST)
From: =?UTF-8?B?546L5beN?= <wangw36@chinatelecom.cn>
To: kent+ietf <kent+ietf@watsen.net>, netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <1948619766.26418.1597752560318@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_26416_868492564.1597752559089"
HMM_WEBCLN_IP: 172.18.8.21
X-HERMES-SENDMODE: normal
X-HERMES-SET: Ir/5xdyPhtw/nKWlnb3tlh2opR3wkHKvQ6wxUNjG5Bw=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/teIuowCv9NUqjpokKe9WS17k-bY>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Adoption-suitability for draft-wang-netconf-adaptive-subscription
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 12:09:32 -0000


Hi all,


I have read this draft, here is my answer to the following two questions:

1) is the problem important for the NETCONF WG to solve?
I believe that it is important to provide adaptive sampling and allow the server switch sampling rate, i.e.,adjusts the volume of telemetry sent from the publisher to the subscriber.
I also have been aware that Microsoft has already adopted adaptive telemetry in ASP.NET and Azure function.
And I believe that the NETCONF WG is the appropriate WG for this work. RFC8639 and RFC8640 provide a good basis for this work.


2) is the draft a suitable basis for the work?
I have reviewed the draft and believe it provide a good basis for the starting point.
If this draft gets adopted, I am willing to review any version of this work and contribute to any discussion.


Best Regards,

----------------------------

Wei Wang

China Telecom

 
 

发件人: netconf [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Kent Watsen
发送时间: 2020 86 6:18
收件人: netconf@ietf.org
主题: [netconf] Adoption-suitability for draft-wang-netconf-adaptive-subscription

NETCONF WG,

Per the previous email sent moments ago, the chairs would like to solicit input on the following draft:

Title: Adaptive Subscription to YANG Notification

Link: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wang-netconf-adaptive-subscription" rel="nofollow">https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wang-netconf-adaptive-subscription
Abstract:

This document defines a YANG data model and associated mechanism

enabling subscriber's adaptive subscriptions to a publisher's event

streams at various different period intervals with which to report

updates. Applying these elements allows both subscriber and

publisher to automatically adjust the volume of telemetry traffic

sent from publisher to the receivers.



In particular, please discuss adoption-suitability as it regards to the following questions:

1) is the problem important for the NETCONF WG to solve?
2) is the draft a suitable basis for the work?


PS: this message is itself not an adoption poll, but rather an attempt to gauge interest/support for a potential future adoption poll.

NETCONF Chairs